Skip to main content

Security report for pegasusart.co.uk

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.jacksonsart.com is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare security verification challenge page, which blocks direct access to the site's content. This prevents extraction of meaningful business, contact, or policy information. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating either the domain is unregistered, privacy-protected, or there is an issue with WHOIS data retrieval. The technical infrastructure relies on Cloudflare's security services, including Turnstile captcha, to mitigate malicious bot traffic. However, this also limits user experience and SEO visibility. Security posture benefits from Cloudflare's protections and Content-Security-Policy headers, but lack of accessible content and policies reduces overall trust and compliance visibility. The site currently scores low on content quality, privacy compliance, and business credibility due to these access restrictions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pegasusart.co.uk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
49
Security headers
75
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of accessible content and WHOIS data, detailed business intelligence is unavailable. The domain appears to be intended for an art supply or related business (inferred from the domain name), but no direct evidence supports this. No contact details, company information, or market positioning data are present. The reliance on Cloudflare's WAF suggests a focus on security, but the lack of visible business data limits assessment of competitive advantages or growth indicators.

Security posture

The website employs Cloudflare's security services, including Turnstile captcha and Content-Security-Policy headers, indicating a baseline security posture aimed at mitigating automated threats. However, the blocking of all content behind a security challenge reduces transparency and usability. No visible forms or inputs are present to assess secure data handling. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, incident response contacts, or certifications indicates gaps in compliance and security governance. The domain's WHOIS data absence further raises concerns about legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Reduce or optimize WAF challenge to allow legitimate user access and improve SEO.
  2. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies accessible without challenge.
  3. Provide visible business contact information and company details on the website.
  4. Ensure WHOIS data is properly registered and publicly available to enhance trust.
  5. Implement comprehensive security headers and conduct regular security audits.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Page is a Cloudflare security verification challenge with Turnstile captcha, blocking direct content access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Cloudflare security service
  • Content-Security-Policy header present

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to Cloudflare WAF challenge page.
  2. No business or contact information is visible on the page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No forms or data collection elements detected.
  5. Only external links are to Cloudflare domains related to the security challenge.
  6. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  7. Security headers include Content-Security-Policy but no other headers visible.
  8. No analytics or marketing scripts detected beyond Cloudflare challenge scripts.
  9. Website is effectively blocked for analysis; content quality and SEO are poor due to lack of accessible content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Cloudflare as a hosting and security provider, leveraging their Turnstile captcha for bot mitigation. The HTML is minimal and primarily serves the security challenge, lacking meta tags, structured data, or SEO elements. No CMS or frameworks are detectable beyond basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to content blocking. Accessibility features are not evident. The technical setup prioritizes security over content delivery, which impacts user experience and discoverability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pegasusart.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pegasusart.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.