Skip to main content

Security report for partnereinkauf.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website partner.partnereinkauf.com serves as a partner login portal for Firststop Deutschland, indicated by the page title and branding. The site is built using modern web technologies such as Angular and Bootstrap, providing a responsive and moderately optimized user experience. However, the site content is minimal and primarily focused on login functionality without public-facing business information or detailed descriptions. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, suggesting the domain may be unregistered, private, or newly created, which raises concerns about the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the site. Security measures include HTTPS and a Content-Security-Policy header, but other security headers and policies are absent. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, indicating low privacy compliance. Overall, the site appears functional for its intended partner login purpose but lacks transparency and trust signals for external users.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching partnereinkauf.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business intelligence is limited due to the lack of public business information on the site. The portal targets partners of Firststop Deutschland, likely in the automotive or retail sector, given the brand association. The business model appears to be a partner network or B2B platform requiring authentication. No additional services, certifications, or contact details are provided. The absence of WHOIS data and public business credentials limits confidence in the business's market position and operational transparency. There are no visible partnerships or subsidiary domains linked from the site.

Security posture

The security posture shows basic maturity with HTTPS enforced and a Content-Security-Policy header implemented, which helps mitigate common web attacks. However, the absence of other security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security robustness. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance and security governance. The domain's unclear registration status further complicates trust and risk assessment.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add additional security headers including X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance security posture.
  3. Verify and publish domain registration details to improve legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels for security and abuse reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Angular, Bootstrap, CKEditor
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Content-Security-Policy header present
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a partner login portal with minimal public content.
  2. No WHOIS registration data found, domain may be unregistered or private.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  4. No contact information or business details publicly available.
  5. Security headers are minimal but include a Content-Security-Policy.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  7. No social media or external business links found.
  8. Website uses Angular framework and Bootstrap styling.
  9. No evidence of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  10. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Angular framework with Bootstrap for styling and CKEditor for rich text editing components. The site is served over HTTPS with a Content-Security-Policy header restricting resource loading to self and trusted domains. Performance appears moderate with no heavy external dependencies or advertising scripts. Mobile optimization is good due to responsive design. Accessibility features are basic with standard HTML semantics but no advanced ARIA roles or landmarks detected. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data present. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with partnereinkauf.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review partnereinkauf.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.