Skip to main content

Security report for parasoft.com

Parasoft · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Parasoft is an established enterprise software company specializing in automated testing solutions that cover every stage of the software development lifecycle. Their platform integrates AI capabilities to enhance software quality validation at speed and scale, serving industries such as aerospace, finance, healthcare, and automotive. The company positions itself as a leader in compliance-driven testing and continuous quality assurance. Technically, the website is built on a modern stack including WordPress and React, with strong SEO, mobile optimization, and performance. The site employs multiple analytics and marketing tools, including Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, and New Relic, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, though public security policies and incident response details are lacking. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts transparency but does not detract from the overall legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing a security policy, vulnerability disclosure, and maintaining updated WHOIS records to enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching parasoft.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention parasoft.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
594
Employees
24
Customers
486
Third parties
84
Weak passwords
25%

Latest record dated 2026-05-28 · 31 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for parasoft.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –paradrop.parasoft.com2026-05-28
  • –adfs.parasoft.com2026-05-28
  • –adfs.parasoft.com2026-05-27
  • –bugzilla.parasoft.com2026-05-27
  • –forums.parasoft.com2025-12-05

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Parasoft operates a B2B business model focused on delivering automated testing tools and compliance solutions to large enterprises across multiple sectors. Their competitive advantage lies in comprehensive product offerings that integrate AI and support industry standards such as ISO 26262 and DO-178C. The company maintains a robust partner ecosystem and showcases major clients, reinforcing market credibility. Revenue streams likely include software licenses, support services, and professional training. The website content and structure reflect a mature organization with a clear focus on enterprise customers and compliance-driven markets.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers, and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness perception. The use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing scripts is well managed, but continuous monitoring for vulnerabilities in these dependencies is advised. GDPR compliance is indicated through privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by adding explicit security governance documentation and dedicated security contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security governance and incident response procedures.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate supply chain risks.
  4. Add dedicated security contact emails (e.g., security@parasoft.com) to improve incident reporting channels.
  5. Update WHOIS registration data to improve transparency and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Parasoft Corporation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Parasoft
Description
Intelligent automated testing platform covering every SDLC stage. Blend human insight with AI to validate software quality at speed and scale.
Key services
Automated testing tools, Static code analysis, Unit testing, API testing, Service virtualization, Test data management, Compliance testing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, React, Tailwind CSS, Google Tag Manager, New Relic Browser Agent, Bing Ads, HubSpot, Crazy Egg, CookieYes
Frameworks
React, WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), New Relic Browser Agent, Plausible Analytics, Crazy Egg, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, New Relic Browser Agent, Crazy Egg, Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is rich, professional, and targeted at enterprise software testing customers
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  4. Good privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanisms
  5. No direct security policy or incident response information publicly available
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which reduces transparency but does not indicate malicious intent
  7. Multiple industry certifications and compliance standards are highlighted
  8. Contact information is available via forms and dedicated pages
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern technology stack including WordPress CMS and React framework, combined with Tailwind CSS for styling. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, New Relic, and Plausible Analytics, reflecting a sophisticated digital marketing and monitoring strategy. Performance is optimized with asynchronous script loading and preconnect hints. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to enhance security documentation and WHOIS transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with parasoft.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review parasoft.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.