Skip to main content

Security report for pages.dev

Cloudflare · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cloudflare Pages is a modern JAMstack platform offered by Cloudflare, Inc., targeting frontend developers seeking fast, collaborative, and performant website deployment solutions. The platform leverages Cloudflare's extensive edge network to deliver unmatched performance and integrates seamlessly with Git and Cloudflare Workers for dynamic functionality. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, reflecting Cloudflare's enterprise stature and technological leadership. Technically, the site is built using modern frameworks such as Gatsby and React, hosted on Cloudflare's infrastructure, and employs advanced analytics and consent management tools like Google Tag Manager and OneTrust. The site is optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, implements key security headers, and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, explicit privacy policies and terms of service are not directly found in the provided content, suggesting room for improvement in transparency and compliance documentation. No WAF or blocking mechanisms interfere with content access, and no vulnerabilities were detected in the visible content. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, technical maturity, and security posture suitable for an enterprise technology provider. Strategic recommendations include publishing clear privacy and terms documents, establishing a vulnerability disclosure channel, and enhancing contact transparency to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of pages.dev. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pages.dev

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
82
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cloudflare Pages operates within the technology sector as a platform service for web developers, focusing on JAMstack hosting and edge deployment. Its competitive advantage lies in Cloudflare's global network and integration with Cloudflare Workers, enabling dynamic and performant web applications. The business model centers on providing scalable, developer-friendly infrastructure with collaboration features and Git integration. Target customers include frontend developers and teams seeking modern deployment workflows. The presence of official Cloudflare branding and links to developer documentation and Discord community channels indicates a strong ecosystem and partnership network. Growth indicators include active developer engagement and migration guides to newer Cloudflare Workers features. The company maintains a consistent brand and market position as a leading edge network provider.

Security posture

The website exhibits a strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive information. The use of Cloudflare's infrastructure inherently provides robust DDoS protection and edge security. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and may hinder rapid incident handling. GDPR compliance is partially indicated by the presence of a cookie consent banner via OneTrust, but the lack of a detailed privacy policy reduces compliance confidence. No known vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found. Overall, the security maturity is high but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance documentation and contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the main navigation.
  2. Implement and publicize a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and general inquiries.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet or exceed WCAG standards for broader inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cloudflare
Description
Cloudflare Pages is a JAMstack platform for frontend developers to collaborate and deploy websites.
Key services
JAMstack hosting, Git integration, Collaboration tools, Integration with Cloudflare Workers
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Gatsby), Cloudflare Workers, OneTrust (cookie consent), Google Tag Manager, Coveo Search UI
Frameworks
Gatsby
Platforms
Cloudflare Pages, Cloudflare Edge Network
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with no visible vulnerabilities

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional product page for Cloudflare Pages, a JAMstack hosting platform.
  2. Content is rich, well structured, and visually appealing.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the page.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via OneTrust with clear consent mechanism.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service links found on the main page HTML provided.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  7. No security or WAF blocking detected.
  8. WHOIS data for the subdomain is not available, consistent with subdomain usage.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based static site generator (Gatsby), hosted on Cloudflare's edge network, ensuring fast load times and global availability. Integration with Google Tag Manager and OneTrust indicates mature analytics and privacy management. The site uses SVG logos and responsive design techniques for excellent mobile optimization. No CMS is detected, consistent with a static site approach. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, with no visible technical debt or deprecated technologies. Performance is optimized, and SEO metadata is properly implemented. Opportunities exist to improve documentation of privacy and security policies and to enhance accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100 −2Low23 findingsView report
  2. 83/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pages.dev. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pages.dev.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.