Skip to main content

Security report for pages.dev

Cloudflare, Inc. · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cloudflare Pages is a developer-centric JAMstack platform offered by Cloudflare, Inc., designed to enable frontend developers and teams to build, collaborate, and deploy fast, scalable websites leveraging Cloudflare's global edge network. The platform integrates deeply with Git providers like GitHub and GitLab, automating build and deployment workflows with preview capabilities and collaboration features. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as React and Gatsby, and integrates analytics and marketing tools like Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Insights. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and Cloudflare's infrastructure underpinning the service, though explicit security headers and incident response contacts are not directly visible. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site and service demonstrate high professionalism and trustworthiness consistent with an enterprise-grade SaaS offering.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pages.dev

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
82
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cloudflare Pages occupies a strong market position as a leading JAMstack platform integrated within the Cloudflare ecosystem, targeting frontend developers and web teams seeking fast, scalable, and collaborative website deployment solutions. The business model is SaaS-based with tiered pricing plans ranging from free to business levels, supporting a wide range of build concurrency and domain limits. The platform's competitive advantages include Cloudflare's extensive edge network, seamless Git integration, and built-in collaboration and analytics features. The company leverages partnerships with GitHub, GitLab, and Discord to enhance developer engagement. Growth indicators include comprehensive documentation, active community channels, and customer testimonials. The website's content and design reinforce Cloudflare's brand consistency and market leadership in web infrastructure services.

Security posture

The security maturity of Cloudflare Pages is high, benefiting from Cloudflare's robust global infrastructure and default HTTPS enforcement. The website does not expose sensitive data and uses modern web technologies without known vulnerable libraries. However, explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options are not evident in the HTML content, which could be improved. There is no visible security.txt or dedicated incident response contact information, which are best practices for vulnerability disclosure and incident management. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, indicating a strong privacy posture. Overall, the security posture supports enterprise-grade deployment but could be enhanced with more explicit security policy disclosures and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance browser security.
  2. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Add dedicated incident response contact information or security contact channels on the website.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are included.
  5. Enhance visibility of privacy compliance measures and data retention policies to build further user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cloudflare, Inc.
Description
Cloudflare Pages is a JAMstack platform for frontend developers to collaborate and deploy websites with fast performance on Cloudflare’s edge network.
Key services
Git integration for automated builds and deployments, Unlimited static site hosting, Preview links for collaboration, Integration with Cloudflare Workers for dynamic functionality, Built-in web analytics
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, Cloudflare Workers, Google Tag Manager, Coveo Search UI
Frameworks
Gatsby
Platforms
Cloudflare Pages
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare security infrastructure

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professional, well-structured, and targeted at developers.
  3. Strong integration with Cloudflare ecosystem and Git platforms.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are clearly linked and GDPR compliant.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the page.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information found.
  7. WHOIS data for the subdomain is not publicly available, consistent with Cloudflare's internal domain management.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  9. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
  10. Use of Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Insights for analytics.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web frameworks such as Gatsby and React, hosted on Cloudflare's infrastructure, ensuring fast performance and global scalability. Integration with Cloudflare Workers enables dynamic functionality beyond static site hosting. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Analytics are implemented via Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Insights, with cookie consent managed through a recognized consent management platform. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a seamless developer experience. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and incident response transparency. Overall, the technical implementation reflects a mature, enterprise-grade platform with strong performance and developer focus.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 84/100 +1Low21 findingsView report
  2. 83/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pages.dev. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pages.dev.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.