Skip to main content

Security report for pages.dev

Cloudflare · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cloudflare Pages is a developer-focused JAMstack platform offered by Cloudflare, Inc., a leading enterprise in edge network and web infrastructure services. The platform enables frontend developers to build, collaborate, and deploy fast websites with seamless Git integration and advanced collaboration features. The website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, modern technology usage, and strong branding consistent with Cloudflare's corporate identity. Technically, the site leverages React, Gatsby, Cloudflare Workers, and integrates analytics and cookie consent tools, reflecting a mature and performant digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and Cloudflare's edge network protection, although explicit security headers and incident response information are not publicly detailed. Privacy compliance is partially addressed via a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks a clearly accessible privacy policy or terms of service on the main page. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned in the technology sector, serving a specialized audience of web developers and teams. Strategic recommendations include enhancing transparency on privacy and security policies, publishing vulnerability disclosure information, and providing direct contact channels for security incidents.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of pages.dev. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 29 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pages.dev

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
70
Email security
82
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cloudflare Pages operates within the technology sector as a platform service targeting frontend developers and software teams. Its competitive advantage lies in integration with Cloudflare's extensive edge network and Workers platform, offering unmatched performance and developer experience. The business model is SaaS/PaaS, monetizing through Cloudflare's broader ecosystem. The website supports growth through developer documentation, community engagement via Discord, and clear calls to action for sign-up and documentation access. The absence of direct contact information and detailed privacy policies suggests a focus on self-service and automated support channels. The partnership ecosystem includes Cloudflare's own services and developer tools. The company's enterprise scale and market leadership provide a strong foundation for continued expansion in JAMstack hosting and edge computing.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and deployment on Cloudflare's secure edge network. Use of cookie consent tools indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS), vulnerability disclosure pages, and incident response contacts limits transparency and may hinder rapid response to security issues. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated by cookie consent but lacks a full privacy policy. The security score is strong but could be improved by publishing detailed security policies and providing direct security contact channels. Overall, the site is secure for its intended audience but would benefit from enhanced security communication and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the main site.
  2. Implement and expose security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide a dedicated security or abuse contact email and incident response information.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance transparency around data protection officer contact and certifications to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cloudflare
Description
Cloudflare Pages is a JAMstack platform for frontend developers to collaborate and deploy websites.
Key services
JAMstack hosting, Git integration, Collaboration tools, Cloudflare Workers integration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, Cloudflare Workers, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Gatsby
Platforms
Cloudflare Pages
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare edge network
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. No WHOIS data available for subdomain, expected behavior.
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main page.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the page.
  6. Strong Cloudflare branding and developer focus.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  9. No explicit security or incident response contact information.
  10. Analytics and tracking scripts present but standard.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Gatsby, hosted on Cloudflare's infrastructure with integration of Cloudflare Workers for dynamic functionality. Performance is optimized with fast loading times and mobile responsiveness. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features are present but could be further audited for compliance. The use of Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Insights provides analytics capabilities, balanced with a cookie consent mechanism for privacy compliance. The technical stack reflects a well-maintained and scalable platform suitable for enterprise-grade web hosting and developer collaboration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100 −3Low23 findingsView report
  2. 84/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pages.dev. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pages.dev.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.