Skip to main content

Security report for paccar-training.com

Other · Australia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in DNS health, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website is a corporate login portal hosted as a subdomain on Microsoft Azure, likely serving employees or authorized users in Australia. It appears to be related to training or learning management, as suggested by the logo and security group names. The platform uses a custom C7 framework with common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Moment.js. The technical infrastructure is moderate, leveraging Azure's hosting capabilities but using somewhat outdated client-side libraries. Security posture is average; the login form uses anti-forgery tokens but lacks visible HTTP security headers and privacy policies, which are critical for compliance and trust. No WHOIS data is available for the subdomain, which is typical for Azure-hosted sites, but this limits external verification of ownership. Overall, the site is functional but requires improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and contact transparency to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      DNS Resolution Failed

      Unable to resolve domain A records

      What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching paccar-training.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention paccar-training.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
6
Employees
0
Customers
6
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
17%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for paccar-training.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind this portal likely operates in the corporate training or workforce management sector in Australia. The platform targets internal users such as staff instructors, managers, and certified instructors, indicating a B2E (business-to-employee) model. The absence of public business information and contact details suggests a closed user base rather than a public-facing commercial site. The use of Azure hosting and a custom framework indicates investment in scalable infrastructure. However, the lack of marketing or analytics tools implies limited external engagement or growth focus. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data. The business model centers on secure access to training resources and notifications, supporting operational efficiency within the organization.

Security posture

Security measures include the use of anti-forgery tokens in the login form, which is a positive control against CSRF attacks. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. The use of an outdated jQuery version (2.1.4) may expose the site to known vulnerabilities if not properly patched. No evidence of incident response contacts or security policies is present, which could hinder timely handling of security events. The site uses HTTPS as implied by the URL but SSL configuration details are not provided. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements in headers, library updates, and transparency to meet best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Update client-side libraries such as jQuery to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements to improve legal adherence and user trust.
  4. Add visible contact information and incident response channels to facilitate communication and security reporting.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve user experience and compliance with standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to be a login portal for a business related to Australia, possibly linked to training or learning management systems as indicated by the logo image path and security groups.
Key services
User authentication, Training management, Notification center
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.1.4, Moment.js, C7 framework 1.2
Frameworks
C7
Platforms
Azure Web Apps
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of anti-forgery token in login form

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for a corporate or training platform.
  2. No public contact information or privacy/cookie policies found.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable due to subdomain nature on Azure.
  4. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  5. Uses older jQuery version (2.1.4) which may have vulnerabilities.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No advertising or marketing tools present.
  8. Basic design and content quality with moderate branding consistency.
  9. No adult or explicit content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom C7 framework version 1.2, hosted on Microsoft Azure Web Apps platform. It uses jQuery 2.1.4 and Moment.js for client-side scripting. The site includes a login form with anti-forgery tokens, indicating some security awareness. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO optimization is minimal with no meta description or Open Graph tags detected. The site lacks modern security headers and uses an older JavaScript library version, which could pose risks. Hosting on Azure provides a reliable infrastructure but the site could benefit from modernization and improved compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with paccar-training.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review paccar-training.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.