Skip to main content

Security report for p2p.org

P2P.org · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

P2P.org is a technology and finance-focused staking platform offering a wide range of staking services including ETH staking dApp, enterprise-grade staking via P2P.org Hub, APIs, and data services across more than 40 PoS blockchains. The company targets institutional clients, private investors, custodians, wallets, and blockchain networks, positioning itself as a leading staking-as-a-service provider with a strong market presence and over 130 institutional clients. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, and Cloudflare services, ensuring fast performance, mobile optimization, and good accessibility. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, bot management, and consent management implemented. However, the WHOIS data is privacy protected and incomplete, which slightly limits domain registration transparency. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching p2p.org

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the blockchain staking sector, providing infrastructure and services that enable clients to stake tokens and earn rewards securely. Its business model includes direct staking products, API integrations, and white-label solutions, catering to a diverse client base from private investors to large custodians and exchanges. The presence of a referral program and partnerships with recognized auditors and certification bodies enhances its competitive advantage. The company emphasizes security and compliance, as evidenced by SOC 2 certification and verified smart contracts. The ecosystem includes partnerships with MixBytes for audits, KirkpatrickPrice for certification, and statuspage.incident.io for uptime transparency, indicating a mature operational framework.

Security posture

P2P.org exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, bot management via Cloudflare, and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. The site uses reputable analytics and marketing tools with transparent data collection and retention policies. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure page and lack of incident response contact details represent areas for improvement. The privacy-protected WHOIS data is justified given the business nature but limits transparency. Overall, the security maturity is high with room for enhanced transparency and formalized security communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
  3. Include explicit contact information for a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact to strengthen GDPR compliance.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Maintain accurate and transparent WHOIS registration data to enhance domain trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
P2P.org
Description
Stake tokens, host nodes, and earn rewards with P2P.org. Explore our staking solutions for ETH, BTC, and more!
Key services
ETH staking dApp, P2P.org Hub enterprise platform, Staking API, Staking Data API, Staking-as-a-Business product, DVT staking, EigenLayer restaking, Data services for PoS networks
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Cloudflare Bot Management, Intercom, Mixpanel, CookieYes Consent Management, Calendly, Dropbox integration
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Web, Web3 integrations
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare Bot Management
  • Cookie consent management with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Mixpanel, Leadfeeder, Intercom
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
doubleclick.net, Microsoft Advertising, Twitter Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Mixpanel, Leadfeeder, Intercom
Marketing tools
Intercom, Calendly
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy management implemented
  3. Multiple staking products and blockchain networks supported
  4. Strong emphasis on institutional clients and enterprise-grade services
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, limiting domain registration transparency
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern technology stack centered on Webflow CMS, integrated with Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Mixpanel, and Intercom for analytics and user engagement. Hosting appears to be via Webflow with Cloudflare services providing bot management and security enhancements. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good accessibility and SEO practices. The use of cookie consent management via CookieYes ensures compliance with privacy regulations. Technical risks are minimal, though reliance on multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security vigilance. The site architecture supports scalability and integration with blockchain staking services effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with p2p.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review p2p.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.