Skip to main content

Security report for ourplaceschools.com

ourplaceschools.com · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ourplaceschools.com is a website currently in a placeholder state with a 'Launching Soon' message and minimal content. The site appears to be built and hosted using GoDaddy Website Builder, with no detailed business description or services provided. The target audience and business model are not clearly defined, and no contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links are present. The domain is registered since 2009 with GoDaddy.com, LLC as the registrar, indicating a legitimate registration but the website content suggests it is under development or inactive. Technically, the site uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA on its contact form, but lacks security headers and comprehensive privacy or terms of service policies. Cookie consent is implemented via a banner with accept/decline options. Overall, the website's security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional headers and policies. The site does not contain any adult or questionable content and is safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ourplaceschools.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
45
Email security
95
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website does not provide sufficient business intelligence data such as market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships. It is likely a small or early-stage project with no visible competitive advantages or detailed operational insights. The presence of GoDaddy ads and hosting suggests reliance on third-party platforms for infrastructure and marketing. No strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The lack of contact details and business information limits the ability to assess growth indicators or customer segments.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled and Google reCAPTCHA protecting the contact form. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security maturity. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the analysis. Improvements are recommended to enhance security best practices and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear business contact information including emails and phone numbers to enhance credibility.
  4. Develop a security policy and incident response contact to demonstrate security readiness.
  5. Enhance website content with detailed business descriptions and services to improve user engagement and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ourplaceschools.com
Description
Website is a placeholder/launching soon page with no detailed business description.
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
GoDaddy Website Builder, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google reCAPTCHA
Platforms
GoDaddy Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
GoDaddy Ads
Tracking pixels
GoDaddy tracking pixel
Marketing tools
GoDaddy Website Builder marketing tools
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a placeholder with 'Launching Soon' message.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service found.
  3. Contact form present with Google reCAPTCHA.
  4. Cookie banner present with consent mechanism.
  5. No explicit business description or services detailed.
  6. Website built and hosted via GoDaddy Website Builder.
  7. No phone numbers, emails, or physical addresses found.
  8. No social media links found.
  9. No security headers detected; SSL is enabled.
  10. Advertising present via GoDaddy ads and tracking pixels.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on GoDaddy Website Builder platform, using standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It includes Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection and a cookie consent banner. Hosting is provided by GoDaddy.com, LLC. The site loads a video background and uses web fonts from Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. No advanced frameworks or CMS detected beyond the GoDaddy builder environment. The site lacks modern security headers and comprehensive metadata such as JSON-LD structured data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ourplaceschools.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ourplaceschools.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.