Skip to main content

Security report for ottokit.com

OttoKit · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OttoKit is a technology company offering a no-code AI automation platform designed to help businesses automate tasks and workflows by connecting over 1,000 applications. The website positions itself as a modern SaaS provider targeting professionals and businesses seeking to leverage AI-powered automation without coding expertise. The platform emphasizes ease of use and integration capabilities to save users time and increase productivity. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and several Gutenberg-related plugins, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. Hosting and domain registration are managed via Cloudflare, providing a reliable infrastructure foundation. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies were found, which is a compliance gap. Analytics and marketing tools such as Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager are used, reflecting a moderate level of user tracking. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ottokit.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
83
DNS health
90
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OttoKit operates in the competitive AI automation SaaS market, targeting businesses that require no-code solutions to automate workflows. Its key competitive advantage lies in the extensive app integrations and AI-powered automation capabilities. The business model is subscription-based SaaS, likely generating revenue through tiered plans or usage-based pricing. The target customer segments include small to medium businesses and professionals seeking efficiency gains. The company appears to be newly founded in 2025, consistent with the domain registration date. There is no indication of parent or subsidiary companies. The website's marketing ecosystem includes affiliate programs and tracking tools, suggesting active customer acquisition strategies. Strategic observations include the need to improve transparency around privacy and security to build greater trust and comply with regulations such as GDPR.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enabled, and the domain status clientTransferProhibited is set, which protects against unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS to spoofing attacks. No security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended best practices to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces some privacy considerations. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities were detected, the site would benefit from implementing additional security controls and publishing relevant policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, including GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Add clear contact information including support emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and compliance.
  5. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OttoKit
Description
Automate tasks without code using OttoKit. Build AI-powered workflows, connect 1,000+ apps, and save hours daily. Start free.
Key services
AI-powered workflow automation, Integration with 1,000+ apps, No-code automation tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Astra Theme, Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg, Spectra Pro, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Gutenberg Blocks
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled (implied by canonical URL and resources)
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found
  4. Uses modern WordPress theme and plugins
  5. Includes tracking scripts for analytics and affiliate marketing
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response information published
  8. Domain is newly registered but consistent with business launch
  9. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Astra theme and Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg, indicating a contemporary and flexible technical infrastructure. It leverages Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, showing integration with industry-standard tools. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, a reputable provider. Performance appears moderate with preloading of fonts and images, but no explicit performance metrics were available. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by Rank Math plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format, enhancing search engine visibility. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ottokit.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ottokit.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.