Skip to main content

Security report for orwin.cz

Orwin s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Orwin s.r.o. is a Czech-based small technology company specializing in custom web development services including B2C e-commerce shops, B2B portals, and comprehensive website solutions. The company emphasizes innovative design, integration with ERP and CRM systems, and guarantees service and expert project management. The website reflects a professional business presence with clear contact information and client references, positioning Orwin as a reliable regional player in the digital solutions market. Technically, the website uses modern front-end libraries such as Swiper.js and Plyr.js, with a custom CMS backend, and is hosted under a Czech registrar with appropriate domain age and registration consistency. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacks visible security headers and incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is well-designed and functional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of orwin.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching orwin.cz

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Orwin operates in the technology sector focusing on tailored web and e-commerce solutions for business clients. Their competitive advantage lies in delivering fully customized B2C and B2B platforms integrated with clients' existing ERP and CRM systems, supported by a senior expert team. The business model is service-oriented with revenue likely from project-based development and ongoing support contracts. The company targets medium to large businesses requiring bespoke digital commerce and web presence. Growth indicators include a stable client portfolio with references from notable organizations. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with payment gateways and logistics providers. Strategic observations suggest opportunities for expanding compliance transparency and security certifications to enhance market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS usage and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. The custom CMS may pose risks if not regularly audited. GDPR compliance is not clearly addressed, and no cookie consent mechanism is present. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires improvements in policy transparency, technical controls, and incident readiness to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies prominently on the website to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response contact channel to improve security transparency and readiness.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of the custom CMS and third-party integrations to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding analytics and user tracking with privacy-compliant consent mechanisms to improve marketing insights while respecting user privacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Orwin s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ08442258
Registration number
08442258
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Orwin s.r.o.
Description
Orwin s.r.o. provides custom web development services including B2C shops, B2B portals, and full website solutions from A to Z. They focus on innovative design, fast systems, ERP and CRM integrations, and guarantee service and expert project management.
Key services
Custom B2C e-commerce shops, B2B portals, Full website development, ERP, CRM, PIM integrations, Post-launch support and service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Bootstrap (implied by CSS classes), Swiper.js, Plyr.js, NoUiSlider
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of HTTPS implied

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No social media links detected in the HTML content.
  5. Custom CMS is used, which may require security review.
  6. No visible security headers or incident response contacts.
  7. Good business presentation with client references and service guarantees.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern front-end stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and libraries such as Swiper.js for carousels and Plyr.js for media playback. Bootstrap framework is used for responsive design, ensuring good mobile optimization. The custom CMS backend is tailored for client needs but may introduce technical debt and security risks if not maintained properly. Hosting is managed via Czech registrar REG-INTERNET-CZ with name servers at forpsi.net and forpsi.it, indicating regional hosting. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images and CSS. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta tags and no Open Graph content filled. Accessibility features are basic but present. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with orwin.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review orwin.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.