Skip to main content

Security report for originalshrine.org

Hug, Vallendar · Other · N/a

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website originalshrine.org serves as an informational platform dedicated to the Original Shrine of the international Schoenstatt Movement, focusing on religious and cultural content. It provides visitors with historical information, event details, a live webcam feed, and media resources such as sermons. The site targets a broad audience interested in religious and cultural heritage, operating primarily as a non-commercial informational resource. The domain is well-established since 2012, registered with a reputable registrar, and shows consistency between WHOIS data and website content. Technically, the website employs basic web technologies including HTML, CSS, JavaScript with jQuery and Superfish for navigation menus, and Google Web Fonts. The hosting provider is Vautron Rechenzentrum AG. While the site uses HTTPS, it lacks advanced security headers and uses an outdated JavaScript library version, which could pose security risks. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, and SEO practices are minimal but functional. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS but misses DNSSEC and security headers, and no cookie consent mechanism is present. No forms or user data collection points were detected, reducing exposure to input-based vulnerabilities. The WHOIS data indicates a legitimate and stable domain registration with no privacy protection, aligning with the website's purpose. No signs of malware, phishing, or adult content were found, indicating a safe browsing experience. Overall, the website is moderately secure and credible but would benefit from updates to its technical stack, enhanced security practices, and improved privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in these areas would strengthen trust and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching originalshrine.org

This scan found 35 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
50
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
53
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

originalshrine.org occupies a niche position as a religious and cultural informational website dedicated to the Schoenstatt Movement's Original Shrine. Its business model is non-commercial, focusing on providing historical, spiritual, and community-related content. The site leverages partnerships with related Schoenstatt domains, enhancing its ecosystem and outreach. Revenue streams are not evident, suggesting reliance on community support or organizational funding. The target audience is broad, including religious followers, cultural historians, and the general public interested in the Shrine. Growth indicators are limited due to the site's informational nature, but consistent domain registration and content updates suggest ongoing maintenance. The partnership ecosystem includes several Schoenstatt-related domains, reinforcing its credibility and reach within its community.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense against common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.2.6) introduces potential vulnerabilities. No visible forms or user input fields reduce the attack surface. Privacy compliance is minimal, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and detailed privacy policies. Incident response and security policy documentation are not present. Overall, the site is moderately secure but requires updates and enhancements to align with modern security standards and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Introduce a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  5. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience across devices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hug, Vallendar
Description
Website about the Original Shrine of the international Schoenstatt Movement, focusing on religious and cultural information, history, events, and services related to the Shrine.
Key services
Webcam live feed, Media center with sermons, Information about the Shrine and its history, Event photos and schedules, Contact and prayer request services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery 1.2.6, Superfish menu plugin, Google Web Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is informational about a religious shrine with multilingual support.
  2. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  3. Contact email found only in meta tag, no visible contact forms or phone numbers.
  4. No cookie consent or tracking detected.
  5. Use of outdated JavaScript libraries may pose security risks.
  6. No visible social media links detected.
  7. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in the HTML.
  8. Website uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain is valid and not privacy protected.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using traditional web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript with jQuery and Superfish plugins for navigation. It uses Google Web Fonts for typography. No CMS or modern frameworks were detected, indicating a custom or static site architecture. Hosting is provided by Vautron Rechenzentrum AG, a known hosting provider. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization techniques observed. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features but maintains a clear navigation structure. Technical debt is evident in the use of outdated JavaScript libraries and absence of modern security practices. Opportunities exist for modernization through updated libraries, implementation of security headers, and improved mobile and accessibility standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with originalshrine.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review originalshrine.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.