Skip to main content

Security report for opiferum.com

Opiferum Oy · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Opiferum Oy is a Finnish technology company specializing in creating modern, user-friendly websites, e-commerce platforms, and intranet solutions tailored to business needs. With over 20 years of experience, they position themselves as a trusted local provider in Hämeenlinna, focusing on clear communication and customer-centric services. Their offerings include website development, online stores, additional services like email hosting and SEO, and ongoing support and training. Technically, the website employs modern frameworks such as Bootstrap, integrates with Google Analytics and Tawk.to for analytics and customer engagement, and uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management. The site is hosted on AWS Cloudfront CDN, ensuring reliable performance and availability. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses standard security headers, and provides a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, though it lacks explicit security policy and incident response disclosures. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and compliant with privacy regulations, reflecting a mature digital presence suitable for its business scope.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching opiferum.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention opiferum.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for opiferum.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Opiferum Oy operates in the technology sector, targeting small to medium-sized enterprises and organizations in Finland seeking web presence and e-commerce solutions. Their business model revolves around customized service delivery, emphasizing client needs and long-term support. The company maintains a strong local market position with a portfolio of satisfied clients and visible testimonials. Partnerships with email service providers and instructional platforms enhance their service ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include project-based website development, recurring maintenance, and value-added services such as SEO and domain management. The company demonstrates growth potential through active content updates and participation in industry events.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. The use of Cookiebot ensures GDPR-compliant cookie management and user consent. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, which could enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is good for a small technology service provider but could be improved with formalized policies and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Add incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and security documentation to maintain compliance with evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Opiferum Oy
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Opiferum Oy
Description
Opiferum Oy tarjoaa verkkosivujen, verkkokauppojen, intranet-ratkaisujen ja lisäpalveluiden suunnittelua ja toteutusta. Yritys painottaa selkeitä, helppokäyttöisiä ja brändiä heijastavia verkkosivuja, jotka lisäävät yhteydenottoja ja myyntiä. Toiminta perustuu 20 vuoden kokemukseen ja asiakaslähtöisyyteen.
Key services
verkkosivut, verkkokaupat, intranetit, lisäpalvelut kuten sähköpostilaatikot, hakukoneoptimointi, domain-hallinta
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap, Cookiebot, Google Analytics, Tawk.to chat
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Tawk.to
Marketing tools
Tawk.to chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie consent regulations.
  3. Clear and multiple contact methods including form, email, phone, and physical address.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and CDN for performance.
  5. No critical security issues detected.
  6. Good user experience and professional design.
  7. Active customer engagement with testimonials and references.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS platform with integration of Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactive elements. It leverages AWS Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, improving load times and availability. Google Analytics and Tawk.to provide analytics and live chat capabilities, respectively. Cookiebot manages cookie consent in compliance with GDPR. The site demonstrates good SEO practices with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading scripts asynchronously and minimizing external dependencies. The technical stack is modern and suitable for the business scale, though documentation on backend technologies is not evident.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with opiferum.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review opiferum.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.