Skip to main content

Security report for operatorict.cz

Operátor ICT, a. s. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Operátor ICT, a. s. is a government-affiliated technology operator focused on providing information and communication technology services for the City of Prague. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image targeting government entities and citizens of Prague, emphasizing technological advancement for the city. The business is medium-sized, founded in 2015, and operates primarily in the technology and government sectors. The website is built using Framer CMS and leverages modern web fonts and JavaScript for presentation. Technical infrastructure appears moderate in performance with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. Security posture is moderate but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is low due to absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. No contact information or incident response details are found in the provided content. WHOIS data is consistent and legitimate, registered with a Czech registrar matching the business profile. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching operatorict.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as an essential public sector technology provider for Prague, focusing on ICT infrastructure and services. Its market position is strong within the municipal government domain, serving as a key technology enabler. The business model is likely funded by public budgets with a focus on technology service delivery rather than commercial sales. The target audience includes government departments and Prague residents. The website content is relevant and professionally presented but lacks detailed business disclosures such as certifications or partnerships. No evident revenue streams or commercial partnerships are disclosed. The company appears to maintain a focused operational scope with no subsidiaries or parent company indicated.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate with HTTPS presumed but no explicit security headers detected in the provided data. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure programs or incident response contacts, which limits transparency and readiness perception. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No tracking or analytics scripts were detected, which reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. The website does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, publishing policies, and establishing incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and improve security transparency.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve trust and readiness.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any hidden vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Operátor ICT, a. s.
Description
Vytváříme technologickou budoucnost pro lepší život v Praze. Operátor ICT, a. s. - Informační a komunikační technologie hl. města Prahy
Key services
Information and communication technologies, Technology infrastructure for Prague
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer, Google Fonts (Manrope, Inter, Neue Haas Grotesk), JavaScript
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a government-related ICT operator for Prague.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage content.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Website uses Framer as CMS and design framework.
  5. No security headers or explicit security policies detected.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided content.
  7. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  8. Content is professional and relevant to public sector technology services.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  10. WHOIS data consistent with business profile.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Framer as its CMS and design framework, leveraging modern web fonts from Google Fonts and JavaScript for interactivity. Hosting and domain registration are managed by WEDOS, a known Czech provider. The site shows good mobile optimization and basic accessibility but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, likely due to the use of external font resources and Framer's framework overhead. There is no evidence of advanced backend technologies or integrations in the provided content. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of privacy compliance mechanisms, which could impact user trust and regulatory adherence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with operatorict.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review operatorict.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.