Skip to main content

Security report for onpro.team

Onpro Team · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Onpro Team is a small, specialized product team offering product management, UX design, and full-stack development services primarily targeting startups and product owners. The team emphasizes customer development, MVP building, and user onboarding design, leveraging their experience from multiple startup accelerators and successful product launches. Their market position is niche, focusing on personalized, nimble product team hire services. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform using jQuery, providing a modern but basic infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized with good design and navigation, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. No advanced analytics or tracking tools are detected, indicating a minimal data collection approach. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and incident response information, which are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is limited due to TLD restrictions and privacy protection, but the business content and references suggest legitimacy. No vulnerabilities or security risks are evident in the content or scripts. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy small business presence with room for enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of onpro.team. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onpro.team

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention onpro.team, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for onpro.team right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Onpro Team operates in the technology sector as a small service-based business providing product team hire and consulting services. Their competitive advantage lies in their combined expertise in product management, UX design, and development, supported by startup accelerator credentials and multiple successful product builds. The business model focuses on direct client engagement for product development and user onboarding. The target customers are startups and small to medium businesses looking for experienced product teams without hiring full-time staff. The company maintains a lean operation with no visible subsidiaries or parent company. Their partnership ecosystem includes references to startup accelerators but no formal partner domains. Growth indicators are not explicitly stated but implied through past product acquisitions and accelerator participation.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate with basic protections in place. The website uses HTTPS (assumed from Webflow hosting) but lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The minimal use of third-party scripts reduces attack surface but also limits analytics and tracking capabilities. Overall, the security maturity is basic and would benefit from implementing standard web security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to demonstrate security readiness and transparency.
  4. Consider adding minimal, privacy-respecting analytics to better understand user behavior while maintaining compliance.
  5. Regularly review and update WHOIS and domain registration information to ensure consistency and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Onpro Team
Description
A nimble, experienced, two-person product team offering product management, UX design, frontend and backend development services to help build and scale web products.
Key services
Customer development & business idea validation, Design & build an MVP, User onboarding design, Product management, Ongoing development tasks
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, jQuery 3.5.1
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small, professional product team portfolio and service offering site.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No phone numbers or physical addresses provided; only email contact available.
  4. No security or incident response policies visible.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond Webflow and jQuery.
  6. No advertising or marketing tracking detected.
  7. WHOIS data is limited and privacy protected, common for small businesses.
  8. Content is safe and business-focused with no adult or questionable material.
  9. Technical implementation is modern but basic, relying on Webflow platform.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging its CMS and hosting capabilities, with jQuery 3.5.1 as the primary JavaScript library. The site features responsive design and good navigation structure, supporting a positive user experience. Performance is moderate, typical for Webflow-hosted sites. SEO and accessibility features are basic but functional. There is no evidence of technical debt or legacy technologies. The lack of advanced analytics or marketing tools suggests a focus on simplicity and privacy. Opportunities exist to enhance SEO, accessibility, and security configurations to improve overall technical maturity and business resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100 +1Medium34 findingsView report
  2. 61/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onpro.team. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onpro.team.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.