Skip to main content

Security report for onfirstup.eu

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website advocate.onfirstup.eu serves as a community discovery platform associated with SocialChorus, enabling users to find their community by submitting their email address. The site is professionally designed with a clear focus on user engagement and community connection, targeting a general audience. The technical infrastructure leverages modern JavaScript libraries and fonts, with analytics implemented via a custom Sega Analytics script. Hosting appears to be managed through the onfirstup.eu CDN, ensuring reliable content delivery. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though the absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates room for improvement. The lack of visible contact information and company details limits business credibility slightly. Overall, the site is functional, secure, and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onfirstup.eu

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
73
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform positions itself as a technology-driven community engagement tool, likely targeting enterprises or organizations seeking to connect with their members or employees. Its business model appears to be SaaS-based, focusing on community discovery and engagement via email. The presence of multiple regional domains suggests a strategy for geographic market segmentation. The lack of explicit business information on the landing page limits deeper insights into revenue streams or partnerships. However, the association with SocialChorus indicates a connection to a broader ecosystem of employee communication and engagement solutions. Growth indicators include multi-region domain deployment and integration of analytics tools. Strategic observations highlight the need for improved transparency and compliance to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. The use of analytics is controlled, but the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a notable gap. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the content. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Incident response and security policy information are not provided, which may impact readiness. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could be enhanced by adopting best practices in headers, transparency, and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and prominently display privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels to enhance business credibility and security readiness.
  4. Improve accessibility features to ensure compliance with standards and better user experience.
  5. Develop and publish terms of service and vulnerability disclosure policies to demonstrate transparency and security commitment.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Platform to help users find their community by entering their email; associated with SocialChorus.
Key services
community discovery, email-based community access
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, analytics.js, bowser (browser detection), Material Icons, Roboto font
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Input fields with maxlength and autocorrect off

Analytics and tracking

Services
analytics.js (Sega Analytics)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
analytics.js
Marketing tools
analytics.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is not publicly available due to EURid privacy policy.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the landing page.
  4. No direct contact information or company details visible on the landing page.
  5. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and fonts.
  6. Analytics tracking is implemented via a custom Sega Analytics script.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is used.
  8. Content is focused on community discovery via email input.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts and fonts. The tech stack includes browser detection via bowser.js and custom analytics integration. Hosting is via onfirstup.eu CDN infrastructure, supporting multi-region domain variants. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks include lack of security headers and incomplete privacy compliance, which could affect user trust and regulatory adherence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onfirstup.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onfirstup.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.