Skip to main content

Security report for oneleet.com

Oneleet Inc. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Oneleet Inc. is a small technology company founded in 2022, specializing in full-stack cybersecurity and compliance automation solutions. Their platform offers services such as SOC 2 compliance, ISO 27001 certification support, penetration testing, and assistance with HIPAA, PCI, and GDPR compliance. The company positions itself as a security-first compliance provider targeting businesses seeking to streamline their security and compliance processes. Technically, the website is built using Framer CMS and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Segment, Posthog, and HubSpot, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks some security headers and formal privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a concern, though the professional website and clear business focus mitigate some risk. Overall, Oneleet presents as a legitimate cybersecurity service provider with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oneleet.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Oneleet operates in the niche cybersecurity compliance market, offering automated solutions that combine real-world security with compliance frameworks. Their SaaS business model targets organizations needing SOC 2, ISO 27001, and other regulatory certifications. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with marketing and analytics platforms to drive growth and customer acquisition. The lack of physical address or phone contact suggests a primarily digital-first operation. Their market positioning emphasizes reducing security theater and delivering practical compliance, which may appeal to startups and SMEs. Growth indicators include active social media presence and use of advanced tracking tools. Strategic observations recommend enhancing transparency with privacy policies and improving domain registration visibility to strengthen trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness perception. The extensive use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Compliance gaps include missing privacy and cookie policies and no explicit GDPR compliance indicators. The security culture appears focused on compliance certifications but could benefit from more visible security governance documentation and user protection mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance site security.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate transparency and incident readiness.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve site performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Oneleet Inc.
Description
Oneleet is the full-stack cybersecurity platform offering automated security and compliance solutions, including penetration testing for SOC 2 and beyond.
Key services
SOC 2 compliance automation, ISO 27001 certification support, Penetration testing, HIPAA, PCI, GDPR compliance assistance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Segment Analytics, Posthog, Apollo Website Tracker, Vector Analytics, HubSpot scripts
Frameworks
Framer (CMS/website builder)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Segment, Posthog, HubSpot Analytics, Vector Analytics, Apollo Tracker
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Ads Pixel, Vector Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Segment, Apollo, Posthog
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain is not found in the registry, which is unusual for an active commercial site.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies were found on the site.
  4. Contact information is limited to a single email address in structured data.
  5. Multiple analytics and marketing tracking scripts are used, indicating extensive user tracking.
  6. Website is focused on cybersecurity compliance services with professional branding.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is present.
  8. No phone numbers or physical addresses found on the site.
  9. SSL is enabled and appears properly configured.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Framer platform, utilizing modern web fonts and a responsive design approach. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing technologies including Google Analytics, Segment, Posthog, Apollo, HubSpot, and Vector Analytics, indicating a sophisticated data collection strategy. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA attributes and semantic HTML. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oneleet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oneleet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.