Skip to main content

Security report for onboarding.pro

Technology · Ukraine

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Onboarding Pro is a specialized consulting service focused on designing handcrafted user onboarding experiences for web applications. The business targets product owners and startups aiming to improve user conversion and retention through effective onboarding. The website showcases professional services including onboarding reviews, case studies, and educational resources such as guides and video toolkits. The market position is that of a niche expert with a portfolio of over 400 products helped, supported by client logos and case studies. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform using modern web technologies like HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery. It is mobile optimized and has good SEO practices, though accessibility is basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve compliance and security practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of onboarding.pro. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onboarding.pro

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, providing professional onboarding design services primarily to startups and SaaS companies. Its revenue model likely includes consulting fees for onboarding reviews and sales of educational products like the Jetway toolkit. The presence of case studies and client logos indicates a credible and growing client base. The founder appears to be an individual professional or small team, given the small company size and lack of parent or subsidiary companies. The business leverages content marketing through a blog and external resources to build authority. Partnerships include Jetway.io for onboarding toolkits. The company is based in Ukraine, consistent with domain registration data. Strategic observations suggest a focused niche approach with potential for expansion through digital products and consulting.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protection, which are positive security indicators. However, it lacks DNSSEC, which could expose DNS spoofing risks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are present, reducing protection against common web attacks. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or incident response contacts, which limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is weak, with no privacy or cookie policies, potentially exposing the business to regulatory risks under GDPR or similar frameworks. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which reduces privacy concerns but also limits business intelligence. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, policies, and DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Provide incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  6. Consider adding phone contact and physical address to improve business credibility and trust.
  7. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to avoid vulnerable libraries.
  8. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Convert more users into customers with an effective onboarding experience designed by professionals. I helped over 400 products and counting.
Key services
User onboarding experience design, Onboarding reviews, Educational resources and toolkits
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery 3.5.1
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is limited to email and contact form; no phone or physical address found.
  4. Website is built on Webflow platform with modern frontend technologies.
  5. No security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. Content is professional, focused on user onboarding consulting services.
  7. External links mostly to trusted domains related to business and resources.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond jQuery and Webflow scripts.
  9. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  10. No explicit or adult content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery 3.5.1. It uses Webflow's hosting and CDN infrastructure, which generally provides good performance and uptime. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and SEO meta tags. However, no advanced analytics or tracking tools are detected, which may limit marketing insights. The absence of security headers and DNSSEC indicates technical debt in security hardening. The site loads moderate resources including images and CSS from Webflow's CDN. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and stable but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100Medium34 findingsView report
  2. 61/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onboarding.pro. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onboarding.pro.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.