Skip to main content

Security report for ohai.ai

Ohai.ai · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ohai.ai is a technology startup offering a personal AI assistant named O that helps users manage daily tasks such as calendar organization, reminders, meal planning, and event coordination. The company positions itself as a smart helper to reduce mental clutter and improve productivity, targeting consumers who seek personal and family organization assistance. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and features strong branding with media coverage from reputable outlets. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like Next.js and Material UI, integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools, and delivers fast performance. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers and incident response policies are not publicly documented. Privacy and cookie policies are present, but a visible cookie consent mechanism is lacking. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection or query failure, which is common for startups but slightly reduces trust. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ohai.ai

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ohai.ai operates in the AI personal assistant market, focusing on consumer productivity and family organization. Its competitive advantage lies in a tailored AI assistant that manages complex household and social calendars, task reminders, and meal planning. The business model appears subscription-based with free trial options and mobile app availability. The company has garnered media attention from major outlets, enhancing market credibility. The target customer segment includes busy adults and families seeking to offload mental clutter. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with grocery services and calendar platforms, though no direct partner domains were identified. Growth indicators include app store presence and active marketing campaigns. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding contact transparency and security policies to build further trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. The use of modern frameworks reduces risk from legacy vulnerabilities. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options in the HTML source is a gap. No public security or incident response policies were found, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. The site uses multiple third-party tracking and marketing pixels, indicating extensive user tracking but no visible cookie consent banner, which may impact GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by publishing security policies, implementing visible consent mechanisms, and adding security.txt or vulnerability disclosure channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner to improve GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website footer.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility, including security and support contact emails, to improve trust and responsiveness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ohai.ai
Description
Ohai.ai offers a personal AI assistant named O that helps users manage everyday tasks such as calendar organization, reminders, meal planning, and coordinating meetups. The service is positioned as a smart helper to reduce mental clutter and improve productivity, especially during busy periods like summer.
Key services
Household calendar management, Task reminders and coordination, Meal planning and grocery list generation, Event RSVP coordination, Document and email scanning for key dates
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Material UI, Klaviyo, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Pinterest Tag, Quora Pixel, PostHog
Frameworks
Next.js, Material UI
Platforms
Web, iOS (App Store)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JavaScript frameworks
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, PostHog, Klaviyo
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Nextdoor Ads, Quora Ads, Pinterest Ads, Reddit Ads, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads, TikTok Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Pinterest Tag, Quora Pixel, PostHog
Marketing tools
Klaviyo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Strong media presence and social proof from reputable sources.
  3. Modern technology stack with good performance and mobile optimization.
  4. Extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  6. Privacy, cookie, and terms policies are present and accessible.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies publicly available.
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or query failure.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React, Next.js, and Material UI, ensuring responsive and performant user experience. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Klaviyo, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Pinterest Tag, Quora Pixel, and PostHog, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. The site is mobile-optimized with excellent design quality and accessibility features. Performance is fast with preloading of key images and scripts. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based solution. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Technical risks are minimal, but reliance on multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface and privacy considerations. Modernization opportunities include enhancing security headers and compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ohai.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ohai.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.