Skip to main content

Security report for ogier.com

Ogier · Other · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ogier is an international legal and professional services firm specializing in offshore law, corporate, fiduciary, and consulting services. The website positions the company as a top-tier provider with a global reach including Asia, the Caribbean, Europe, and the Middle East. The digital presence reflects a professional and modern approach, utilizing contemporary JavaScript technologies and tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight Tag. However, the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies, as well as the lack of WHOIS data, slightly detracts from the overall trustworthiness. Security measures such as HTTPS and cache control headers are in place, but additional security headers and incident response information are missing. Overall, the website is well-designed and functional, serving its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ogier.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
70
Email security
83
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ogier operates in the professional services sector, focusing on legal and fiduciary services with an international client base. The firm likely generates revenue through legal consulting, corporate services, and fiduciary management. The website's content and branding suggest a medium-sized enterprise with a consistent market position as a top-tier offshore law firm. The lack of detailed business registration or contact information on the website limits deeper business intelligence insights. The presence of partner links such as webreality.co.uk indicates collaboration with digital service providers. The firm targets international clients requiring specialized legal and corporate services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS and cache control headers to prevent stale content. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of advanced security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is noted. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which are important for compliance and trust. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces moderate user tracking but no overt privacy compliance mechanisms were found. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved with enhanced headers and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and prominently link a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and compliance.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
  5. Improve WHOIS data availability or provide domain registration transparency to increase legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ogier
Description
Top tier international and offshore law, corporate and fiduciary, and consulting services. Targeted, pragmatic advice from Asia, Caribbean, Europe, Middle East.
Key services
international law, offshore law, corporate services, fiduciary services, consulting services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Cookie consent script
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, CookieScan
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, limiting domain trust assessment.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the HTML content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Website uses modern JavaScript and tracking technologies including Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight Tag.
  6. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. Website content is professional, focused on international legal and fiduciary services.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries, including Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight Tag for analytics and marketing. The HTML structure includes appropriate meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and includes accessibility considerations such as viewport meta tags. Performance appears moderate based on included scripts and CSS. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site uses cache control headers to prevent stale content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented but could benefit from additional security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ogier.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ogier.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.