Skip to main content

Security report for oceanair.co.uk

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

62/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.oceanair.co.uk is currently inaccessible due to an SSL handshake failure between Cloudflare and the origin server, resulting in a Cloudflare error 525 page. The domain itself appears to be invalid or improperly registered as per the Nominet UK WHOIS lookup, which reports that the domain cannot be registered due to naming rules violations. No meaningful website content, metadata, or business information is available for analysis. The technical infrastructure relies on Cloudflare as a CDN and security provider, but the origin server's SSL configuration is misconfigured, preventing secure connections. Security posture is weak due to the lack of SSL connectivity and absence of security headers or policies. Overall, the website is non-functional and untrustworthy in its current state, with no visible compliance or business credibility indicators.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oceanair.co.uk

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content and domain registration issues, no reliable business intelligence can be derived. There is no evidence of company information, market positioning, or services offered. The domain's invalid status suggests the website may not be operational or officially established. No partnerships or related domains are identified. The absence of contact details and policies further limits business insights.

Security posture

The security posture is critically weak. The SSL handshake failure indicates a fundamental misconfiguration in the origin server's SSL setup, preventing secure HTTPS connections. No security headers or policies are present. The website is protected by Cloudflare, but the protection is ineffective due to the origin server issue. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found. Compliance with GDPR or other regulations cannot be confirmed. Immediate remediation of SSL configuration is necessary to restore security and accessibility.

Recommendations

  1. Correct the SSL certificate and configuration on the origin server to enable successful handshake with Cloudflare.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Establish and publish privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and trust.
  4. Provide clear business contact information and company details on the website.
  5. Conduct a full security audit and implement vulnerability disclosure and incident response procedures.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Page is a Cloudflare error 525 SSL handshake failure page indicating origin server SSL misconfiguration; content is blocked from normal access These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare

Security

Observed score
10/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is inaccessible due to SSL handshake failure between Cloudflare and origin server
  2. No meaningful website content available for analysis
  3. No metadata, structured data, forms, or contact information found
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected
  5. No security policies or incident response information available
  6. No business or company information present
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to domain registration error
  8. Cloudflare WAF is active and blocking access due to SSL issues
  9. No analytics or advertising scripts detected
  10. Website is effectively non-functional and untrustworthy in current state
Technical notes

Notes

The website is served behind Cloudflare but fails to establish a secure SSL connection to the origin server, resulting in an error 525. No CMS or frameworks are detected due to lack of content. The HTML is minimal and only contains the Cloudflare error page markup. No analytics, advertising, or tracking scripts are present. The domain is not properly registered, which may indicate technical or administrative issues. Performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO cannot be assessed due to lack of content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oceanair.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oceanair.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.