Skip to main content

Security report for oblsk.com

OBLSK LLC · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OBLSK LLC is a technology service provider specializing in software development, technical advisory, API development, and Ruby on Rails expertise. The company positions itself as an experienced partner with over 12 years of business experience and more than 50 shipped products, targeting businesses seeking scalable and high-quality digital solutions. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides detailed service descriptions and case studies that demonstrate their capabilities and client successes. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and HTML, with hosting and DNS managed via Cloudflare. Performance is fast, and the site is mobile responsive with good SEO and accessibility features. Tracking is implemented via Plausible Analytics and LinkedIn Insight Tag, indicating moderate user tracking. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place. However, it lacks DNSSEC, security headers, explicit privacy and cookie policies, and incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is consistent and legitimate, with no privacy protection or suspicious patterns. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy business front but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to improve user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oblsk.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OBLSK operates in the technology sector, focusing on software development and technical consulting services. Their market positioning is that of a small but experienced provider with a strong portfolio of shipped products and long-term team expertise. The business model centers on delivering custom software solutions and advisory services to enterprises and startups. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts and ongoing technical support. The company showcases partnerships and client logos but no direct parent or subsidiary relationships. Growth indicators include detailed case studies and a professional online presence. The partnership ecosystem includes LinkedIn for marketing and analytics. Strategic observations suggest a focus on quality, client collaboration, and technical excellence to maintain competitive advantage.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS and domain transfer protection, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and incident response contacts indicates gaps in security and compliance maturity. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, but the lack of explicit security documentation and policies could impact regulatory compliance and user trust. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces moderate user tracking, which should be balanced with privacy compliance measures. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could be improved with formalized policies and technical enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OBLSK LLC
Description
We build sturdy & streamlined technology solutions. OBLSK provides software development, technical advisory, API development, and Ruby on Rails expertise to deliver fast, scalable, and beautiful applications.
Key services
Application development, Technical advisory, API development, Ruby on Rails development
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML, Ruby on Rails (implied), Swiper.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight, Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found
  3. Contact information only via contact form, no direct emails or phone numbers visible
  4. Use of LinkedIn Insight and Plausible Analytics for tracking
  5. Professional and consistent branding and design
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy present
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. Domain registration and WHOIS data consistent and legitimate
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern front-end technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, leveraging libraries such as Swiper.js for UI components. Hosting and DNS services are provided by Cloudflare, ensuring reliable performance and security features like HTTPS and domain transfer protection. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured navigation. Tracking is implemented via Plausible Analytics and LinkedIn Insight Tag, indicating a moderate level of user data collection. There is no evidence of a CMS or backend platform from the HTML content. Performance is fast with preloading of key images and asynchronous script loading. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oblsk.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oblsk.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.