Skip to main content

Security report for norr.com

NORR | Architecture, Engineering, Planning and Interior Design · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NORR is a well-established architecture, engineering, interior design, and planning firm with a professional online presence. The company has been in operation since 1994, indicating a mature business with a stable market position. Their website reflects a professional services model targeting clients seeking comprehensive design and engineering solutions. The firm leverages modern web technologies such as WordPress with Elementor, NitroPack for performance optimization, and integrates analytics and cookie consent tools to comply with privacy regulations. Social media integration is consistent and supports brand visibility. Technically, the website is well-constructed with fast loading times, mobile optimization, and good SEO practices. The use of NitroPack and CDN services enhances performance. However, some security best practices such as enabling DNSSEC and publishing security policies are missing. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, but lacks visible security headers and incident response contact information. From a security perspective, the site shows a moderate to good posture with no evident vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance, though no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were detected in the provided content. The domain registration is consistent with the business profile, showing a long history and no privacy protection, which supports legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and technically sound, but could improve by publishing comprehensive privacy, security, and incident response policies to enhance compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching norr.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NORR operates in the professional services sector, specifically architecture and engineering, serving clients requiring design, planning, and interior design services. The firm appears to have a medium-sized operation with a focus on quality and professionalism. Their business model is service-oriented, likely generating revenue through project contracts and consulting. The website's integration with social media and analytics indicates an active marketing approach. The absence of explicit contact details on the site may suggest a preference for controlled client engagement or reliance on direct outreach. The company benefits from a long domain history, enhancing credibility. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating attention to privacy compliance. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. There is no published security policy or incident response information, limiting transparency and preparedness visibility. Third-party scripts from Google Analytics, ContentSquare, and Wistia are used, which require ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened by implementing recommended headers, DNSSEC, and publishing security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate reporting and handling of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NORR | Architecture, Engineering, Planning and Interior Design
Description
NORR is an architecture and engineering firm with a professional team of architects, engineers and interior designers.
Key services
Architecture, Engineering, Interior Design, Planning
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
NitroPack, Elementor, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, ContentSquare, Wistia
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, ContentSquare
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
ContentSquare, Wistia
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found in provided content
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content
  5. Social media presence is linked and consistent
  6. Uses modern web technologies and performance optimization (NitroPack)
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. No security or incident response policies published
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging NitroPack for caching and performance optimization. It uses modern web technologies including jQuery and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and loads quickly due to CDN usage. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). The technical infrastructure is robust, but there is room for improvement in security configurations and documentation. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with norr.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review norr.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.