Skip to main content

Security report for nobid.io

NoBid · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NoBid is a specialized programmatic advertising technology platform focused on optimizing the bottom of the ad stack to increase revenue for publishers. The company offers advanced display advertising and OTT/CTV solutions, leveraging proprietary pricing algorithms and a no-risk integration model. The website presents a professional and modern digital presence built on WordPress, utilizing various plugins and technologies to enhance user experience and functionality. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and anti-spam measures, though explicit privacy and security policies are not publicly available. Overall, the site reflects a credible business with a clear market position in the programmatic advertising industry.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nobid.io

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NoBid targets publishers and media companies seeking to maximize ad revenue through innovative programmatic technology. Their competitive advantage lies in focusing on unfilled and undervalued inventory, providing solutions that complement existing demand stacks. The business model is B2B with a no-risk approach, supported by proprietary algorithms and dedicated account management. Partnerships with companies like GreenWrap and MediaFuse indicate a collaborative ecosystem. Testimonials from clients reinforce the effectiveness and flexibility of their offerings. The company operates in the technology and media sectors, likely at a medium organizational size.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and uses anti-spam plugins to protect forms. However, it lacks visible security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, and no security.txt file is found. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent banner present but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service documents. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers limits transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with room for improvement in policy publication and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service on the website.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency.
  4. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers for better trust and support.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NoBid
Description
NoBid is a programmatic technology platform focusing on optimizing the bottom of the ad stack to increase yield, fill rates, CPMs, and revenue for publishers. It offers display advertising and OTT/CTV solutions with proprietary pricing algorithms and a no-risk model.
Key services
Display Advertising Solutions, OTT/CTV Solutions, Proprietary Pricing Algorithms, Revenue Optimization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Slider Revolution, CleanTalk Anti-Spam, Amazon Polly, Responsive Vector Maps, Font Awesome, Bootstrap
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Anti-spam plugin (CleanTalk)
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CleanTalk pixel
Marketing tools
CleanTalk Anti-Spam
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based programmatic advertising platform site
  2. Content is business and technology focused with clear service offerings
  3. No public WHOIS data available, indicating privacy protection
  4. Cookie consent banner and anti-spam measures are implemented
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main page
  6. Contact available via form only, no direct emails or phone numbers found
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present
  8. Good use of modern web technologies and plugins
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
  10. Site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging popular plugins such as Slider Revolution, CleanTalk Anti-Spam, Amazon Polly, and Responsive Vector Maps. The tech stack includes jQuery and Bootstrap for frontend functionality. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses modern web standards but lacks some accessibility features. Hosting provider details are not discernible. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and professional design, though some technical debt is indicated by missing security headers and incomplete policy documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nobid.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nobid.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.