Skip to main content

Security report for nittoatpfinals.com

Other · N/a

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.nittoatpfinals.com serves as the official digital platform for the Nitto ATP Finals tennis tournament, providing live scores, draws, group standings, news, video content, and player information. It targets tennis fans and sports enthusiasts, delivering timely and relevant event information. The site leverages modern web technologies including Vue.js and integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Ad Manager for analytics and advertising purposes. While the site demonstrates good content quality and user experience, it lacks explicit privacy and security policies and does not expose contact information, which may limit user trust. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises questions about domain legitimacy, although the site appears professionally maintained and branded. Overall, the site is functional and informative but could improve transparency and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

      Prevents MIME type sniffing

      What to do: Add "X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff"

      • CAPEC-209
      • ASVS V3.4.4
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
    • Medium

      Missing X-XSS-Protection header

      Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

      What to do: Add "X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block"

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

Keep watching nittoatpfinals.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Nitto ATP Finals website positions itself as an authoritative source for tennis event information, focusing on the season finale held in Turin, Italy. Its business model revolves around content provision and advertising revenue, as evidenced by Google Ad Manager integration. The target audience includes global tennis fans and sports media consumers. The site’s use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the lack of visible business contact details and privacy documentation suggests limited direct customer engagement or e-commerce activities. The domain’s unclear WHOIS status may reflect privacy protection or recent registration, which is atypical for official sports event sites. Strategic partnerships or sponsorships are not explicitly identified in the content provided.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, and includes a cookie consent banner indicating some level of privacy compliance. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The site uses third-party scripts from reputable sources but lacks visible security or incident response policies and contact channels. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration details reduces trust and complicates legitimacy verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly enhanced by implementing standard security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and providing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service page to enhance transparency and compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels to build trust and facilitate communication.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration details to ensure domain legitimacy and improve trustworthiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to prevent vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Live scores, draws, group standings, news, video, players and more from the tennis season finale in Turin, Italy, 13-20 November.
Key services
live scores, draws, group standings, news, video content, player information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Axios, Google Tag Manager, Google Ad Manager, Video.js
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ad Manager, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an official event site for the Nitto ATP Finals tennis tournament.
  2. Content is rich with live scores, news, and multimedia related to the event.
  3. No direct contact information or privacy policy page found in the provided content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented indicating some privacy compliance.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered in the public database, which is unusual.
  6. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and Google advertising/analytics tools.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; potential area for improvement.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Vue.js, a modern JavaScript framework, and utilizes Axios for HTTP requests. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Ad Manager for analytics and advertising, indicating a mature marketing infrastructure. Video.js is used for media playback, enhancing multimedia content delivery. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes a cookie consent mechanism for GDPR compliance. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was identified. Performance appears moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and SEO optimization. The absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that should be addressed to improve overall site robustness and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nittoatpfinals.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nittoatpfinals.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.