Skip to main content

Security report for ninjateam.org

Ninja Team · Technology · Iceland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ninja Team is a specialized WordPress plugin development company established in 2015, offering a suite of popular plugins designed to enhance WordPress website functionality. Their market position is solid within the WordPress ecosystem, supported by a portfolio of featured plugins and a loyal user base exceeding 200,000 clients. The company targets WordPress site owners, developers, and businesses seeking efficient plugin solutions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern tools such as Elementor, Yoast SEO, and LiteSpeed Cache, hosted behind Cloudflare for performance and security. The site demonstrates excellent design, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, security headers present, and privacy protection on domain registration, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security policy is published. Privacy compliance is good with a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service, but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained, with moderate user tracking via Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing security and incident response policies, and implementing cookie consent to enhance compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ninjateam.org

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ninja Team operates in the technology sector focusing on WordPress plugin development and support services. Their business model revolves around software sales and customer support, targeting a niche market of WordPress users globally. The company leverages partnerships such as with YayCommerce for affiliate marketing and plugin distribution. Their competitive advantage lies in a diverse plugin portfolio, strong customer testimonials, and active social media engagement. Growth indicators include a large client base and continuous content updates via their blog. The company maintains a consistent brand identity and professional online presence, supporting sustained market relevance.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, multiple security headers implemented, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of privacy protection for WHOIS is standard for small tech companies. However, the absence of DNSSEC and a publicly available security or incident response policy indicates room for improvement. Forms are secured with Google reCAPTCHA v3, reducing spam and abuse risk. Tracking technologies are used responsibly with no signs of malicious scripts. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security policies and improving DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ninja Team
Description
NinjaTeam develops amazing WordPress plugins to enhance website functionality and user experience.
Key services
WordPress plugin development, Customer support, Plugin customization
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO, LiteSpeed Cache, Elementor
Frameworks
Yoast SEO, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of privacy protection for WHOIS
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with CAPTCHA (Google reCAPTCHA v3)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms
  2. Strong focus on WordPress plugin development and support
  3. Good SEO and social media integration
  4. No direct company emails or phone numbers publicly listed, contact via forms
  5. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations
  6. Privacy policy and terms of service clearly linked and comprehensive
  7. No cookie consent banner detected, potential compliance gap
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  9. Active social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust WordPress platform using modern plugins and frameworks such as Elementor and Yoast SEO, ensuring high performance and SEO optimization. Hosting behind Cloudflare provides CDN and security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is fast due to caching and optimized assets. Technical debt appears low with current technologies and best practices in place. Opportunities exist to further modernize DNS security and enhance privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ninjateam.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ninjateam.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.