Skip to main content

Security report for nexy7574.co.uk

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website timedout.uk is a personal site operated by an individual known as 'nex', focusing on cybersecurity interests, programming skills, and casual gaming. It serves as a personal blog and portfolio with links to various social and gaming profiles. The site does not represent a commercial business entity and lacks formal business information or contact details. Technically, the site is built with standard HTML and CSS, hosted likely on a Linux-based VPS environment with Cloudflare as the domain registrar. The site is accessible without any WAF or security challenges and uses HTTPS with DNSSEC enabled, indicating a good baseline security posture. However, the absence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies and lack of contact information limits its privacy compliance and business credibility. The WHOIS data shows an anomalous domain creation date set in the future, which raises questions about domain registration legitimacy but does not directly impact the site's content or security. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and provides a moderate level of technical and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nexy7574.co.uk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website functions as a personal branding and blogging platform for an individual with interests in cybersecurity, programming, and gaming. It does not operate as a commercial business and thus lacks revenue streams, formal partnerships, or market positioning. The target audience is general internet users interested in technology and personal blogs. The site links to a broad ecosystem of personal and community sites, indicating active engagement in niche technical communities. There is no evidence of monetization or business partnerships. Growth indicators and strategic business insights are limited due to the personal nature of the site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic but solid security posture with HTTPS enabled and DNSSEC active on the domain. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and there is no published security policy or incident response information. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a gap in compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content. The site does not use tracking or analytics scripts, reducing privacy risks. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the site content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a privacy policy and cookie policy to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information and a security incident response contact channel.
  4. Correct or clarify the WHOIS domain registration data to remove inconsistencies.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and SEO metadata to improve user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal website/blog of an individual named 'nex' focusing on cybersecurity interests, programming skills, and casual gaming. The site shares personal interests and links to various social and gaming profiles.
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, Caddy server, Proxmox, Ubuntu Server, Fedora, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • DNSSEC enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal blog/personal site of an individual named 'nex'.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. No forms present on the site.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data.
  7. WHOIS data shows domain creation date in the future, which is inconsistent.
  8. Site content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenge.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. Site links extensively to external personal and community sites.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML and CSS, with no detected CMS or JavaScript frameworks. Hosting appears to be on a Linux-based VPS environment managed with Proxmox, running Ubuntu and Fedora, with Cloudflare as the domain registrar. The site uses Caddy server as indicated by linked badges. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. There is no evidence of modern frontend frameworks or advanced SEO optimization. The site is simple and functional but could benefit from modernization and improved technical SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nexy7574.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nexy7574.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.