Skip to main content

Security report for netigate.se

Netigate · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Netigate is a technology company specializing in experience management solutions that unify customer and employee feedback into actionable insights through an AI-powered platform. Positioned as a leading online survey software provider, Netigate offers services including customer experience management, employee experience management, consulting, and AI-driven analytics. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure built on WordPress with modern tools such as Elementor, HubSpot, and Google Tag Manager, supporting a professional and responsive user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, GDPR compliance, ISO certification, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, though explicit security headers and incident response policies are not publicly disclosed. Overall, the site reflects a trustworthy and professional business presence, though the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and direct contact emails slightly reduce transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of netigate.se. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching netigate.se

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
25
Email security
87
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Netigate operates in the technology sector, targeting businesses seeking to optimize customer and employee experiences. Its SaaS business model leverages AI to analyze feedback data, providing competitive advantages in market positioning. The company maintains a consistent brand and offers multiple language options, indicating a broad international reach. Partnerships include career and consulting services, with integrations to popular marketing and analytics platforms. The absence of direct contact emails suggests a preference for managed communication channels via forms. The company’s certifications and compliance with GDPR and ISO standards enhance its credibility in regulated markets.

Security posture

Netigate exhibits a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS, GDPR compliance, and ISO certification. The presence of a detailed cookie consent banner with granular categories indicates attention to privacy regulations. However, the website lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended best practices. No public security policy or incident response contact information is found, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is published. These gaps suggest opportunities to improve transparency and incident readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Consider creating and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Provide direct company contact emails or phone numbers for security and general inquiries to improve communication channels.
  5. Regularly review and update WHOIS information to ensure domain registration transparency and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Netigate
Description
Experience Management that drives growth and turns insights into action. Unify the voice of your customers and employees in one AI-powered platform. Turn insights into action and fuel your company’s success.
Key services
Customer Experience Management, Employee Experience Management, Netigate Consulting, AI-powered feedback analysis, Surveys and NPS tools
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight, LiveChat, jQuery, Swiper.js, Chargebee
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • GDPR compliance
  • ISO certification
  • Cookie consent banner with granular categories
  • Secure EU-based servers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), HubSpot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Chargebee
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professional and business-focused on experience management
  3. Strong GDPR and ISO compliance signals
  4. Multiple language options available
  5. Robust cookie consent mechanism implemented
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed, only contact forms
  7. Use of modern web technologies and marketing/analytics tools
  8. WHOIS data unavailable or privacy protected, requiring further verification
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO for optimization. It integrates multiple third-party services including HubSpot for marketing automation, Google Tag Manager for analytics, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel, and LiveChat for customer engagement. The site uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js for UI components. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The presence of Chargebee indicates subscription or billing management integration. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence with room for security header enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with netigate.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review netigate.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.