Skip to main content

Security report for netigate.se

Netigate · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Netigate is a leading provider of experience management software, offering an AI-powered SaaS platform that unifies customer and employee feedback to drive business growth. The company targets businesses seeking to enhance their experience management capabilities through advanced analytics and actionable insights. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with professional design, comprehensive content, and strong SEO practices. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor, integrating multiple analytics and marketing tools such as HubSpot, Piwik PRO, and LinkedIn Insight, reflecting a modern and data-driven infrastructure. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, although the absence of a public vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contacts suggests room for improvement. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, but the lack of WHOIS registration data introduces some uncertainty regarding domain legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing transparency around security policies and domain registration details to further build trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching netigate.se

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Netigate occupies a strong position in the experience management software market, leveraging AI to differentiate its offerings. Its business model is SaaS-based, targeting medium-sized enterprises and larger organizations. The company benefits from a consistent brand presence and active social media engagement. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for platform access and premium services. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with marketing and analytics platforms, enhancing product value. Growth indicators are positive given the professional website and certifications like ISO 27001. However, the missing WHOIS data could be a risk factor in certain markets. The company should consider clarifying its corporate structure and registration details to strengthen business credibility.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and secure form implementations. The presence of ISO 27001 certification indicates adherence to recognized information security standards. However, the absence of a publicly accessible security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and may hinder external security collaboration. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The integration of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts necessitates ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing detailed security and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and accessible vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  2. Provide incident response contact information, such as a dedicated security or abuse email address, to improve transparency and responsiveness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to minimize potential vulnerabilities from external dependencies.
  4. Enhance visibility of security policies and certifications on the website to build user trust and demonstrate commitment to security.
  5. Consider registering the domain with transparent WHOIS information or provide justification for privacy protection to improve domain legitimacy perception.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Netigate
Description
A Leading Experience Management Software Solution
Key services
Customer feedback collection, Employee feedback collection, AI-powered insights, Experience management platform
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Piwik PRO, HubSpot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Font Awesome, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with CAPTCHA and consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Piwik PRO, Dreamdata Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, HubSpot Analytics, Piwik PRO
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Dreamdata Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. WHOIS data is missing or domain not found in registry, which is unusual
  4. Strong SEO and structured data implementation
  5. Multiple analytics and marketing tools integrated
  6. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured
  7. No explicit or adult content detected
  8. Contact information and policies are present and comprehensive
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder, supported by a modern tech stack including jQuery, Swiper.js, and Font Awesome. SEO is optimized with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) is implemented for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance is moderate, with multiple external scripts for analytics and marketing which may impact load times. Mobile optimization and accessibility are excellent, ensuring a broad user reach. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Technical risks include dependency on multiple third-party services which require vigilant security management. Opportunities exist to streamline scripts for performance gains and to enhance technical documentation for security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with netigate.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review netigate.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.