Skip to main content

Security report for netart.com

NetArt Group · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NetArt Group operates a professional and comprehensive cloud services platform under the netart.com brand, offering a wide range of hosting, email, domain registration, SSL certificates, VPS, SaaS, and monitoring services. The company positions itself as a market leader with over one million customers and extensive domain registrations, emphasizing modern cloud infrastructure, AI-enhanced services, and global data center presence. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and service descriptions, targeting business customers and professionals seeking reliable cloud solutions. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, Google Analytics, Cookiebot for consent management, and TYPO3 CMS, with strong virtualization technologies like LXC and KVM underpinning their hosting services. Security-wise, the company complies with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standards, offers 2FA, spam and virus protection, and DDoS mitigation, though explicit security headers and incident response contacts are not publicly detailed. The absence of WHOIS data for the main domain is a concern but likely due to privacy or alternative domain registration practices. Overall, the site reflects a mature, trustworthy cloud services provider with a strong security posture and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching netart.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NetArt Group holds a strong market position as a global cloud services provider with a broad portfolio including domain registration, hosting, email, VPS, SaaS, and monitoring. Their business model leverages a partner commission program and targets enterprises and SMEs requiring scalable, secure cloud infrastructure. The company benefits from a large customer base and extensive domain portfolio, indicating stable revenue streams. Their use of AI for service customization and security enhancement suggests innovation focus. The partnership ecosystem includes specialized service domains and tools enhancing customer experience. Growth indicators include continuous service expansion and emphasis on modern technologies like Kubernetes and containerization. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining transparency in privacy and incident response to further strengthen trust.

Security posture

NetArt Group demonstrates a mature security posture with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification, 24/7 expert support, and advanced protections such as 2FA, spam and virus filtering, and DDoS mitigation. The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting privacy awareness. However, the absence of explicit security headers in the HTML and lack of publicly available incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Compliance with GDPR is implied but not explicitly documented on the site. Overall, the security culture appears strong but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized vulnerability disclosure channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive, easily accessible privacy policy and terms of service to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and publicly disclose a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance security transparency and incident response readiness.
  3. Add explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Content-Security-Policy to strengthen web security posture.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including abuse and security team emails, to facilitate incident reporting and response.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and maintain compliance with best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NetArt Group
Description
NetArt Group operates globally in nearly 100 countries providing traditional hosting and cloud-based solutions including SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, CDN services, SSL certificates, and domain registration. They emphasize modern, secure, and AI-enhanced cloud services with 24/7 support.
Key services
CloudHosting, Business Email (CloudMail), Email Marketing, Domain Registration and Transfer, SSL Certificates, Website Monitoring, VPS Hosting, SaaS Applications, Kubernetes Containerization
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, Splide.js slider, LXC virtualization, KVM virtualization, PHP (implied by phpMyAdmin and PHP databases), MariaDB, PostgreSQL, Redis, OpenSearch, MongoDB, DirectAdmin
Platforms
Cloud Hosting, SaaS, VPS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • 2FA protection for email
  • Spam and virus protection on email
  • DDoS/IPS/WAF protection mentioned
  • ISO/IEC 27001:2022 compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Mailer Panel Email Marketing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong emphasis on cloud services, hosting, email, and domain registration.
  3. Use of modern technologies and compliance with ISO 27001 standard.
  4. Comprehensive service offerings with 24/7 support and partner program.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main page.
  6. Cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot.
  7. WHOIS data for main domain not found, indicating possible privacy or alternative registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including TYPO3 CMS, JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Splide.js, and integrates Google Analytics and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management. Hosting infrastructure leverages LXC and KVM virtualization technologies, supporting scalable cloud hosting, VPS, and SaaS offerings. Performance is optimized with CDN integration and image compression. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with clear navigation and structured content. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on third-party scripts and incomplete security header implementation. Opportunities exist to modernize security practices and enhance transparency around data protection and incident response.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with netart.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review netart.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.