Skip to main content

Security report for navu.co

Navu.co · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Navu.co is a technology company founded in 2023 that provides an AI-powered companion solution specifically designed for B2B websites. Their core offering includes an AI Sidebar that guides visitors, visitor journey analytics, and detailed visitor insights to help marketers improve engagement and conversions without needing to overhaul existing websites. The company targets B2B marketers and marketing agencies, offering a free tier for agencies to encourage adoption. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern theme and SEO plugins, integrating third-party marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot and Google Analytics. The site is mobile optimized and well structured, providing a good user experience. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS with domain registration protections but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers are published, but a physical address in Palo Alto, CA is provided. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and focused on delivering AI-driven marketing enhancements for B2B clients.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching navu.co

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Navu.co occupies a niche in the B2B marketing technology sector, offering AI tools that enhance website visitor engagement and analytics. Their business model is SaaS-based, targeting marketing teams and agencies with a freemium approach for agencies. The company demonstrates strategic partnerships with multiple marketing agencies and showcases client logos to build credibility. The use of privacy protection in domain registration is justified given the business type. The company appears to be in early growth stages given the recent domain registration and founding date. Their competitive advantage lies in ease of integration and AI-powered visitor guidance without requiring website redesigns. The marketing ecosystem includes HubSpot and Typeform integrations, supporting lead capture and analytics. The company’s operations and market presence are consistent with a small but focused technology startup.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with mandatory HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited status. However, it lacks several recommended security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) and does not publish a security policy or incident response contacts. No security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy is found. The site uses multiple third-party scripts which should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. Cookie consent mechanisms are absent, which may impact GDPR compliance. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small SaaS company but could be improved to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
  3. Add an explicit cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Navu.co
Description
Enhance your B2B website with Navu's AI companion. Effortlessly guide visitors, gain insights into user journeys, and boost engagement without overhauling your existing site.
Key services
AI Sidebar for visitor guidance, Journey Explorer for visitor analytics, Visitor analytics, Free offering for marketing agencies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Yoast SEO plugin, GeneratePress theme, jQuery, Google Analytics, HubSpot scripts, Typeform embed, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Typeform
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional B2B SaaS marketing site focused on AI tools for websites
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and calls to action
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  4. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools
  5. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected
  6. WHOIS privacy protection used but justified
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policy found
  8. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the GeneratePress theme and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a solid technical foundation. Integration with HubSpot and Google Analytics provides marketing and analytics capabilities. The site is mobile optimized and uses modern fonts and responsive design. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The domain is registered with GoDaddy and uses Cloudflare DNS, suggesting reliable hosting infrastructure. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates some technical debt in security hardening. The site uses multiple external scripts which may impact load times and security if not managed properly. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals but has room for security and performance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with navu.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review navu.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.