Skip to main content

Security report for navattic.com

Navattic · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Navattic is a technology company specializing in interactive product demo software designed to enhance buyer engagement and streamline the sales process. Their platform enables embedding demos on websites, sharing demos during sales cycles, and integrating demos into email campaigns. The company targets B2B SaaS businesses, sales, and marketing teams, positioning itself as a next-generation solution for interactive demos. Founded in 2019, Navattic serves a range of customers from startups to global industry leaders. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Clearbit, PostHog, and Dreamdata. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses modern JavaScript libraries, but lacks explicit security headers and visible security policies. No privacy or cookie policies were found in the provided content, and no direct contact or incident response information is visible, which are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises some legitimacy concerns, though the professional presentation and customer references support the business credibility. Overall, Navattic presents a professional and trustworthy SaaS offering with room to enhance transparency and security posture.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of navattic.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching navattic.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Navattic operates in the competitive SaaS market focused on sales enablement and marketing technology. Their interactive demo software addresses a clear market need for engaging prospects and accelerating sales cycles. The business model is subscription-based SaaS, targeting primarily B2B customers. The company demonstrates strong branding consistency and customer validation through logos and use cases. Their marketing ecosystem includes integrations with major CRM and analytics platforms, indicating strategic partnerships and a focus on data-driven growth. The absence of WHOIS data suggests a need for domain registration verification to strengthen trust. Navattic's growth indicators include a focus on multiple use cases and increasing demo engagement rates, positioning them well for expansion in the sales and marketing technology sector.

Security posture

The website shows a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. The absence of privacy and cookie policies may also indicate compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. No contact channels for incident response or abuse reporting are visible, which is a best practice for mature security programs. Overall, while the site is secure in transport and uses modern tech, it would benefit from enhanced security headers, published policies, and incident response information to improve its security maturity and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear links on the website footer or header.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Add visible contact information including company emails and phone numbers for support and sales.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Navattic
Description
Delight your prospects with interactive product demo software. Embed your product on your website, share in the sales cycle, and send in email campaigns.
Key services
Interactive product demos, Embedding demos on websites, Sharing demos in sales cycles, Email campaign demo sharing, Lead engagement and intent signals
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Clearbit, HubSpot, PostHog, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Dreamdata analytics
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of modern JavaScript libraries
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), HubSpot Analytics, PostHog, Dreamdata, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Ads, HubSpot Ads Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Dreamdata
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Clearbit, Dreamdata
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive demos
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in provided HTML
  3. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts used
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, raising some legitimacy concerns
  7. Strong branding and customer logos indicate established business presence
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React/Next.js framework, leveraging server-side rendering and optimized image loading for performance. It integrates multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Clearbit, PostHog, and Dreamdata, indicating a sophisticated data collection and marketing stack. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Hosting provider details were not found. Performance appears fast with preloading and deferred scripts. Technical risks include potential over-reliance on third-party scripts which may impact privacy and performance if not managed carefully. The site lacks explicit security headers which could be addressed to reduce attack surface.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100 +1Medium28 findingsView report
  2. 73/100 −2Medium28 findingsView report
  3. 75/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with navattic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review navattic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.