Skip to main content

Security report for naum.studio

Brainmedia, s.r.o. · Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Naum Studio is a Slovakia-based multi-disciplinary design studio specializing in branding, UI/UX, and product development for startups, fintech, health, and web3 sectors. The company positions itself as a creative partner solving complex challenges with simple solutions, targeting innovative and technology-driven clients. Their business model revolves around providing comprehensive design and development services, supported by a professional portfolio and client testimonials that enhance their market credibility. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, GSAP, and various analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Hotjar. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and uses HTTPS with reCAPTCHA for security. However, some security headers and DNSSEC are missing, indicating room for improvement in security hardening. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS and anti-bot measures in place but lacks explicit security policies and incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is addressed with a GDPR-compliant privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. The domain registration data is consistent and supports the legitimacy of the business. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, with minor technical and security enhancements recommended to elevate its security posture and compliance maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching naum.studio

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Naum Studio operates in a niche market segment focusing on design and brand development for technology-driven sectors such as fintech and web3. Their competitive advantage lies in their multi-disciplinary approach and ability to deliver tailored solutions for startups and innovative companies. Revenue streams likely include project-based design and development contracts. The target customer segments are startups and businesses in fintech, health, and web3 domains. The company shows growth potential through its diversified service offerings and strong client testimonials. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and analytics providers, supporting marketing and performance tracking. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing security policies and expanding incident response readiness to build further trust with enterprise clients.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from automated abuse. Analytics and tracking scripts are loaded asynchronously to reduce performance impact. However, the absence of DNSSEC and HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a compliance gap. No explicit incident response or security policy information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. Data protection practices appear basic but adequate for the business type. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by documenting data retention policies and providing more granular cookie management options.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Brainmedia, s.r.o.
Description
Naum is a multi-disciplinary design studio based in Slovakia. They solve complex challenges with simple solutions, helping startups, fintech, health, and web3 clients achieve their visions and goals.
Key services
Art direction, Advertising, UI & UX design, Branding & identity, Book covers, Development, Photography, Print, Product design, Mobile
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.7, GSAP TweenMax, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Google reCAPTCHA v3, WordPress 6.7.2, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional design studio portfolio with clear branding and service offerings.
  2. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. Domain registration data supports legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is based on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap and jQuery. It integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Hotjar, indicating a mature approach to user behavior analysis. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring accessibility across devices. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and security headers, which could be addressed to reduce attack surface. The hosting provider uses DNS parking services, which may limit advanced DNS configurations. Overall, the technical implementation supports business goals but has opportunities for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with naum.studio. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review naum.studio.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.