Skip to main content

Security report for nanoxi.com

Nanoxi Sàrl · Technology · Switzerland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nanoxi Sàrl is a Swiss web agency based in Sion, Valais, specializing in web creation, ecommerce solutions, SEO/SEA, mobile applications, and Microsoft-based IT consulting. The company targets SMEs, associations, and local entities seeking digital transformation with a focus on quality and proximity. Their market position is strengthened by partnerships with Microsoft and Google certifications, offering a comprehensive digital service portfolio. Technically, the website uses modern web standards, Umbraco CMS, and integrates analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Mouseflow, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the website is professional, well-branded, and trustworthy, though privacy compliance needs enhancement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nanoxi.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nanoxi operates in the technology sector as a small-sized digital agency with a clear focus on local Swiss markets. Their business model revolves around providing tailored web development and digital marketing services, leveraging open-source CMS and cloud solutions like Microsoft 365. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with local clients and recognized technology providers, enhancing credibility and market reach. Growth indicators include a diverse portfolio of projects and active social media presence. However, the absence of explicit privacy and security policies may impact compliance and client trust in regulated environments.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. The use of asynchronous loading for analytics scripts reduces performance impact but raises privacy considerations due to lack of consent mechanisms. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency. Security headers are not evident in the HTML, suggesting potential gaps in defense-in-depth. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small agency but could be improved by implementing formal policies, security headers, and user consent frameworks to align with GDPR and best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Add contact information for a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact to support compliance and user inquiries.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and maintain security hygiene.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nanoxi Sàrl
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nanoxi Sàrl
Description
Agence web offrant service de proximité, qualité "Made in Switzerland" et solutions modernes pour création de site internet, ecommerce et développement web
Key services
Création site internet, Solutions ecommerce, Développement web, SEO/SEA, Applications mobiles, Conseil et développement Microsoft, Référencement Google
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Umbraco CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Mouseflow
Frameworks
Umbraco CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and analytics scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mouseflow
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adwords
Tracking pixels
Mouseflow
Marketing tools
Mouseflow
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage
  3. Contact information is present but no direct company email found in visible content
  4. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Umbraco)
  5. Good SEO and structured data implementation
  6. Presence of multiple client and partner links indicating active business relationships
  7. Use of Google Analytics and Mouseflow for user behavior tracking without visible cookie consent
  8. No visible security headers in HTML content; likely handled at server level
  9. No visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Umbraco CMS with a modern front-end using HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript libraries including jQuery. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for marketing and user behavior analysis, alongside Mouseflow for session replay. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for SEO with proper meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous script loading improving load times. Accessibility features are basic but present. No major technical debt or obsolete technologies detected. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and privacy compliance features to reduce risk and improve user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nanoxi.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nanoxi.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.