Skip to main content

Security report for najbrt.cz

Studio Najbrt · Other · Czech Republic

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Studio Najbrt is a leading Czech graphic design studio specializing in a wide range of creative services including branding, visual identity, motion graphics, 3D design, web design, and more. The company targets clients seeking comprehensive and lasting design solutions with a blend of precision, boldness, humor, and surprise. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with excellent content quality and user experience. Technically, the site uses a modern CMS platform (Solidpixels) and integrates popular libraries and tools such as Google Tag Manager, Swiper.js, and Fancybox. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and error monitoring via Sentry, though some security headers and policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent mechanism but lacks explicit privacy and terms of service pages. WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits domain trust assessment. Overall, the site is professional, secure, and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching najbrt.cz

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention najbrt.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for najbrt.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Studio Najbrt operates as a small-sized creative agency in the graphic design sector within the Czech Republic. Its business model is service-based, focusing on delivering high-quality design projects across multiple creative disciplines. The company maintains a strong market position as a leading studio in its region, supported by a comprehensive portfolio and regular news updates. The website indicates a focus on client engagement through clear navigation and content relevance. The absence of detailed business registration or contact information on the site suggests a potential area for improvement in business credibility. The use of a professional CMS and integration with marketing and analytics tools indicates a mature digital presence. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the domain analysis.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and the use of Sentry for error tracking. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The site lacks publicly available security policies or incident response contacts, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent implemented but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in policy documentation and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance transparency and compliance.
  2. Add and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Investigate and resolve the lack of WHOIS data to improve domain registration transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Studio Najbrt
Description
We are a graphic design studio where experience meets courage. We work consistently and solve everything comprehensively so that the results of our work last long and have meaning. Sometimes with humour, sometimes with surprise.
Key services
Logo design, Visual identity, Motion graphics, 3D design, Web design, Publications, Exhibitions, Art projects, Typeface design, Cinema and music related design
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery (possibly), Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Solidpixels CMS, Swiper.js slider, Fancybox lightbox, AOS (Animate on Scroll), Flatpickr, Sentry for error tracking
Frameworks
Solidpixels CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible sensitive data exposure
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring
  • Secure forms with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager implied)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces transparency.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the analyzed content.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and CMS platform.
  7. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  9. No certifications or compliance badges visible.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Solidpixels CMS platform and uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager for analytics, Swiper.js for sliders, Fancybox for lightbox functionality, and AOS for animations. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses lazy loading for images to optimize performance. The technical implementation is solid with responsive design and good SEO meta tags. However, some security headers are missing, and no hosting provider information was identified. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in accessibility and security header implementation. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with najbrt.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review najbrt.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.