Skip to main content

Security report for nafi.de

NAFI GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NAFI GmbH is a well-established German company specializing in insurance software solutions, particularly for car insurance brokers, with a dominant market share in Germany. Founded in 1990, it offers cloud-based platforms with extensive tariff and functional coverage, serving brokers, pools, insurers, and portals. The company is part of the Acturis Group, indicating a strong corporate backing. The website reflects a professional and comprehensive presentation of their products and services, targeting insurance professionals and related businesses. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as jQuery and FontAwesome, hosted likely via Deutsche Telekom infrastructure, and is optimized for mobile devices with good SEO practices. Security posture is adequate but could be improved by adding explicit security headers and incident response information. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies, though no explicit cookie consent mechanism is detected. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and business-focused with no signs of suspicious or malicious activity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nafi.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nafi.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
561
Employees
0
Customers
561
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
15%

9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for nafi.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NAFI holds a leading position in the German insurance software market, particularly for brokers in the car insurance segment. Their SaaS business model focuses on cloud-based solutions with a broad tariff database and API offerings for portals. The company targets insurance brokers, pools, dealerships, insurers, and portals, providing tailored software solutions. The affiliation with the Acturis Group suggests strategic partnerships and potential for growth. The website content and statistics demonstrate active engagement and a mature product offering. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the main page suggests a controlled communication approach, possibly via contact forms. The company maintains a professional brand image with consistent messaging and detailed product information.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content. However, no explicit security headers (such as CSP, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options) were detected in the provided data, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which are important for transparency and trust. The absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files indicates a potential gap in security communication. No vulnerable libraries or scripts were identified, and forms appear to be standard without visible security issues. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from improvements in headers, policies, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and improve user privacy control.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NAFI GmbH
Description
Die NAFI GmbH ist Deutschlands führender Hersteller für Versicherungssoftware mit einem Marktanteil im Maklergeschäft von über 80 % (lt. Aussage der größten Kfz-Versicherer). Seit 1990 entwickelt und vertreibt NAFI Lösungen für Makler/Vermittler, Pools, Autohäuser, Versicherer und Portale. Unsere intuitiv zu bedienenden Cloud-Lösungen bieten den größten Tarif- und Funktionsumfang am Markt.
Key services
Insurance comparison software, Cloud-based solutions, Tariff and function-rich platforms, APIs for portals, Market analysis tools for insurers
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, FontAwesome, Green Audio Player
Platforms
Cloud-based solutions
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS implied by URL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. No WAF or blocking detected
  3. Strong business focus on insurance software solutions
  4. Clear navigation and well-structured content
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page
  7. Parent company affiliation stated
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML
  9. No social media links found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including jQuery and FontAwesome, with a custom green audio player script. The hosting appears to be via Deutsche Telekom based on nameservers, indicating reliable infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata. Performance is moderate, with no obvious technical debt or errors in the HTML structure. Accessibility is basic but present, with some ARIA roles and labels in audio controls. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking scripts in the provided HTML, which may indicate a privacy-conscious approach or limited marketing tracking. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for modernization and enhanced security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nafi.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nafi.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.