Skip to main content

Security report for nadia.moe

Soluciones Corporativas IP, c/o Whois Proxy · Technology · Spain

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nadia.moe is a personal website representing Nadia Santalla, a systems programmer and container enthusiast. The site serves as a professional portfolio and contact hub, linking to social media profiles and providing downloadable CV content. The business model is personal branding within the technology sector, targeting a general audience interested in software engineering. The website is newly established in 2024 and uses privacy protection for domain registration, which is common for personal sites. Technically, the site employs modern CSS frameworks such as matcha.css and XP.css, along with Material Design icons, resulting in a visually appealing and mobile-optimized experience. The site is simple, with no complex CMS or analytics tools detected, which reduces attack surface but also limits tracking and marketing capabilities. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility. From a security perspective, the domain is protected with clientTransferProhibited status, but DNSSEC is not enabled. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing risk exposure. The site content is safe and professional with no adult or questionable material. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally presented but would benefit from enhanced security headers, privacy policies, and DNS security improvements. The domain registration is legitimate and consistent with the website's personal branding purpose.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nadia.moe

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
85
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nadia.moe, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for nadia.moe right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Nadia Santalla as a software engineer with a focus on systems programming and container technologies. It leverages a personal branding approach with links to GitHub, LinkedIn, and other community platforms, indicating an active presence in the developer ecosystem. The business model is informational and portfolio-based, with no direct commercial transactions. The site is small-scale and targets peers, recruiters, and collaborators in the technology sector. The use of privacy proxy for WHOIS is a standard privacy measure. The external links and friends section suggest a networked community presence, enhancing credibility and potential collaboration opportunities.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate. The domain uses clientTransferProhibited status to prevent unauthorized transfers, but DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended improvement. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The absence of forms reduces attack vectors, but also means no secure input handling is necessary. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which is typical for personal sites but could be improved for transparency. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations, representing a compliance gap.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update website dependencies and frameworks to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Soluciones Corporativas IP, c/o Whois Proxy
Description
Personal website of Nadia Santalla, a systems programmer and container enthusiast, sharing links and contact information.
Key services
software engineering, personal portfolio, contact and social media links
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, matcha.css, XP.css, MaterialDesign-Webfont
Frameworks
matcha.css, XP.css
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited set
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Personal website of a software engineer with clear professional branding.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No forms or data collection mechanisms present.
  4. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data.
  6. Domain uses privacy protection proxy for WHOIS.
  7. Website uses modern CSS frameworks and icons.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
  9. Multiple external links to professional and community sites.
  10. No phone numbers or physical addresses found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with clean, valid HTML5 and CSS3, using modern styling frameworks such as matcha.css and XP.css, and Material Design icons for UI elements. The site is static with no detected CMS or server-side scripting, reducing complexity and attack surface. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS is managed via custom name servers. Performance is moderate with responsive design for mobile devices. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but provides basic mobile optimization and clear navigation. There is no evidence of technical debt or legacy code. Opportunities exist to enhance SEO and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nadia.moe. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nadia.moe.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.