Skip to main content

Security report for n2eyes.pl

n2eyes Agencja Interaktywna · Other · Poland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

n2eyes Agencja Interaktywna is a small interactive web agency based in Gniezno, Poland, specializing in creating unique websites. Their market position is that of a local service provider with a social media presence on Facebook, where they engage with a modest audience. The business model focuses on providing web design and interactive website creation services to businesses and individuals. Technically, the company leverages the Facebook platform for its online presence, utilizing modern web technologies such as React and JavaScript, with hosting and infrastructure managed by Facebook. The page is mobile optimized and performs well, though SEO is basic due to platform constraints. Security posture benefits from Facebook's robust HTTPS and platform security, with no direct vulnerabilities observed on the page. However, the absence of privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies on the page indicates a gap in compliance and transparency. Overall, the risk is low given the platform's protections, but the company should consider linking or publishing these policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 7 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching n2eyes.pl

This scan found 11 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
70
Email security
98
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the web design and interactive agency sector, targeting local businesses and individuals in Poland. Their competitive advantage lies in personalized web solutions and a local market focus. Revenue streams likely come from service contracts for website development. The Facebook page serves as a marketing and engagement channel, with 150 likes and 149 followers indicating moderate community interest. The partnership with their official website n2eyes.pl suggests a broader digital footprint. Growth indicators are limited from the page alone, but the presence on a major social platform supports outreach. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. Strategic observations include the need for enhanced privacy and compliance documentation to meet regulatory expectations and improve customer trust.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate, primarily due to reliance on Facebook's platform security. HTTPS is enforced, and no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the page content. The lack of explicit security or incident response policies on the page is a compliance gap. There is no evidence of GDPR compliance indicators or data protection officer contact information. The business should consider formalizing security policies and incident response plans, especially if handling client data beyond the Facebook platform. The current posture is sufficient for a social media presence but limited for standalone web operations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish or link to comprehensive privacy and cookie policies on the official website and Facebook page.
  2. Develop and communicate clear terms of service to users and clients.
  3. Establish an incident response plan and provide contact channels for security issues.
  4. Enhance GDPR compliance by appointing a data protection officer or providing relevant contact information.
  5. Regularly review and update security practices for all digital assets beyond the Facebook platform.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
n2eyes Agencja Interaktywna
Description
n2eyes Agencja Interaktywna, Gniezno. 150 likes. Tworzymy niepowtarzalne strony www
Key services
Web design, Interactive website creation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Facebook platform, JavaScript, CSS
Platforms
Facebook
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced by Facebook
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (implied by Facebook platform)
Marketing tools
Facebook marketing tools
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Facebook business page for n2eyes Agencja Interaktywna
  2. No direct website content other than Facebook page content
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the page itself
  4. Contact information including phone and email is provided in About section
  5. Page has moderate social proof with 150 likes and 149 followers
  6. No security or incident response policies published on the page
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  8. Content is business focused and safe for general audiences
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The technical infrastructure is based on Facebook's platform, leveraging React and modern JavaScript frameworks. The page is well optimized for mobile devices and loads efficiently. SEO is basic, constrained by the Facebook environment. No CMS other than Facebook Pages is used. Hosting and content delivery are managed by Facebook, ensuring high availability and security. The use of Facebook's analytics and marketing tools is evident, supporting user engagement and advertising efforts. Technical risks are minimal given the platform's robustness, but reliance on a third-party platform limits direct control over security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with n2eyes.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review n2eyes.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.