Skip to main content

Security report for myright.de

myRight · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

myRight is a German legal services platform specializing in consumer rights across various legal domains such as tenancy law, emissions scandal, travel law, and labor law. The company positions itself as a consumer advocate with a high success rate in court cases, targeting German consumers seeking legal assistance online. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and comprehensive content relevant to its services. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks like Laravel, uses Cloudflare for DNS and security, and integrates Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, CSRF protection, and security headers, though explicit security and incident response policies are not publicly available. Overall, the site demonstrates good privacy compliance and business credibility, though contact information is limited to web forms without direct emails or phone numbers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048
  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching myright.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention myright.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for myright.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

myRight operates in the legal services sector, focusing on consumer legal issues in Germany. Its business model centers on providing online legal advice and case management, likely monetized through legal service fees or commissions. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its specialization and high reported success rate. The company maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and trust signals such as cookie consent and Google Tag Manager integration. The absence of direct contact details suggests a controlled communication channel, possibly to streamline client intake. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, but external domains like Proven Expert indicate reputation management efforts.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, use of Cloudflare for DNS and security, and implementation of security headers. Forms include CSRF tokens, enhancing protection against cross-site request forgery. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism limits transparency and readiness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The security score is good but could be improved by publishing explicit policies and contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Add data protection officer contact details to enhance GDPR transparency.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and cookies to minimize privacy and security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
myRight
Description
myRight bietet Verbrauchern Rechtsdienstleistungen in den Bereichen Mietrecht, Abgasskandal, Reiserecht, Arbeitsrecht und weiteren Rechtsgebieten.
Key services
Mietrecht, Abgasskandal, Reiserecht, Arbeitsrecht, Bußgeld, Abfindung, Autounfall, Fahrradunfall, Mietpreisbremse
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare, Laravel, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Flickity (carousel), Averta font family
Frameworks
Laravel
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens in forms
  • Cookie consent with opt-in
  • Use of Cloudflare for DNS and security

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot pixel, Proven Expert cookie
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot.
  3. No explicit security or incident response policy pages found.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed; contact via web form.
  5. Strong branding and professional design with clear navigation.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  7. Good privacy compliance with GDPR indicators.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Laravel framework, indicating a modern PHP backend. It uses Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services, enhancing performance and security. Frontend technologies include Flickity for carousels and custom fonts loaded asynchronously for performance. Cookiebot manages cookie consent, ensuring GDPR compliance. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tag management. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is fast with preloaded fonts and CSS. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based solution. Hosting details beyond Cloudflare DNS are not disclosed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with myright.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review myright.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.