Skip to main content

Security report for mvdigitalgroup.com

MV Digital Group · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MV Digital Group operates as a specialized digital marketing agency focusing on tailored media campaigns and digital strategy execution. Their website demonstrates a professional approach with clear branding and integration of modern marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Google Analytics, and Microsoft Clarity. The company targets businesses seeking customized digital marketing solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy policies. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in transparency and compliance documentation. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and technology usage suggest a legitimate business presence. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security practices and clearer compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mvdigitalgroup.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mvdigitalgroup.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mvdigitalgroup.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MV Digital Group positions itself as a boutique digital strategy and media execution firm, likely serving small to medium-sized businesses. Their business model revolves around providing customized campaign strategies rather than off-the-shelf solutions. The use of advanced marketing tools and analytics indicates a data-driven approach. The lack of explicit company registration or contact details on the site limits transparency but does not negate the professional presentation. The company appears to be independent with no parent or subsidiary relationships disclosed. Their market niche is technology-driven marketing services, with potential growth opportunities in expanding compliance and trust signals to enhance client confidence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting avenues for responsible security reporting. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, indicating some privacy awareness. The integration of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and necessitates regular security audits. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices in HTTP security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  4. Provide explicit company contact information including emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  5. Regularly audit and monitor third-party scripts and integrations to reduce potential security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MV Digital Group
Description
We approach every campaign differently because each client is unique when it comes to their goals and media strategy needs.
Key services
Digital Strategy, Media Campaign Execution
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, HubSpot scripts, Microsoft Clarity, FontAwesome, WPBakery Page Builder, Lottie Player, Google Fonts
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional digital marketing agency site built on WordPress.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, indicating possible privacy protection or unregistered domain.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented indicating some privacy compliance effort.
  5. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools are integrated.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  8. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  9. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  10. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a focus on search engine optimization. It uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, HubSpot marketing tools, Microsoft Clarity for user behavior analytics, and FontAwesome for icons. The site loads Google Fonts and Lottie animations, enhancing visual appeal. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The presence of multiple analytics and marketing scripts suggests a mature digital marketing infrastructure. However, the lack of detected security headers and incomplete WHOIS data indicate areas for technical improvement. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mvdigitalgroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mvdigitalgroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.