Skip to main content

Security report for municipal.hr

Municipal d.o.o. · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Municipal d.o.o. operates a website that currently serves as a minimal online presence, displaying only a logo on a plain blue background without any substantive business information or content. The lack of descriptive content, contact details, or service information limits the ability to assess the company's market position or business model. The website appears to be either under development or a placeholder. From a technical perspective, the website is very basic with no detectable scripts, frameworks, or CMS. There is no evidence of modern web technologies or SEO optimization. Mobile optimization and accessibility are minimal due to the lack of content and structure. Security posture is weak as there is no indication of HTTPS usage or security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present. The security evaluation highlights critical gaps including absence of HTTPS, lack of privacy and cookie policies, and no contact or incident response information. These factors significantly reduce trustworthiness and compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for small businesses but further limits transparency. Overall, the website poses a low risk in terms of content safety as it contains no adult or questionable material. However, the minimal content and lack of security and compliance features suggest a need for significant improvements to enhance trust, security, and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching municipal.hr

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention municipal.hr, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for municipal.hr right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business intelligence analysis is limited by the absence of detailed information on the website. Municipal d.o.o. is identified only by name with no description of its sector, services, or market positioning. The lack of contact information and business details suggests a very small or nascent operation. There are no visible partnerships, certifications, or growth indicators. The business model and revenue streams cannot be determined from the available data. The company appears to maintain a minimal digital footprint, which may impact its competitive advantage and customer engagement.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is poor. The absence of HTTPS indicates that data transmitted to and from the site is not encrypted, exposing users to potential interception. No security headers are present to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure policies, incident response contacts, or security certifications. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the site lacks fundamental security controls and transparency, increasing risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure data transmission.
  2. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR.
  3. Add clear contact information including email and phone numbers to improve trust and communication.
  4. Incorporate security headers and conduct a security audit to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website content and structure to provide meaningful business information and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Municipal d.o.o.
Description
No business description or detailed information about the business is provided on the website. The site only displays a logo on a blue background.
Content quality
poor
Branding
consistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and consists only of a logo image on a blue background.
  2. No metadata such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found.
  3. No forms, no contact information, no external links, no social media links detected.
  4. No scripts or libraries detected in the HTML head or body.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS information available from provided data.
  6. WHOIS data indicates privacy protection, limiting registrant transparency.
  7. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  8. No evidence of tracking, analytics, or advertising.
  9. Website appears to be a placeholder or under construction.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with minimal HTML and CSS, lacking any JavaScript or modern frameworks. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. The site does not include meta tags for SEO or social media integration such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. Performance is likely moderate due to the simplicity of the page, but mobile optimization and accessibility are poor given the lack of responsive design elements and content. The technical debt is low due to minimal implementation but modernization is needed to support business growth and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with municipal.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review municipal.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.