Skip to main content

Security report for mmalatvia.eu

Other · Latvia

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security and Security headers.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.mmalatvia.eu represents a small MMA club based in Latvia, offering MMA training sessions and group workouts. The site is hosted on the Blogger platform and primarily targets MMA enthusiasts in Riga and surrounding areas. The content is basic but relevant to the business focus, with descriptions in Latvian and Russian languages. The technical infrastructure relies on Google services including Adsense, Fonts, and Translate, indicating moderate digital maturity but limited custom development. Security posture is minimal with no detected security headers and no visible privacy or terms of service policies, which could expose the site to compliance risks. The domain WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely due to privacy protection, which is common for small businesses but reduces transparency. Overall, the site is functional but lacks advanced security and compliance features, suggesting room for improvement in trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mmalatvia.eu

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The MMA club operates in the sports and fitness sector, focusing on mixed martial arts training. Its business model is service-based, targeting local customers interested in MMA coaching and group training. The site does not reveal detailed business information such as company registration or certifications, limiting insight into market positioning. Advertising through Google Adsense and tracking scripts indicates some monetization or promotional efforts. The absence of contact details and formal policies may hinder customer trust and growth potential. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The club appears to be a small local entity with a niche audience.

Security posture

Security maturity is low; the site uses HTTPS but lacks security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No incident response or security policy information is provided. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating some awareness of privacy regulations, but no privacy policy or GDPR compliance details are found. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases privacy risks. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators are detected in the provided data. The site would benefit from enhanced security controls, formal policies, and transparency to improve its security posture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  4. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve user trust.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
MMA nodarbības, клуб ММА в Риге, тренировки в группе ММА, тренер по ММА, MMA klubs Rīgā, mma zāle,
Key services
MMA training sessions, Group MMA workouts, MMA coaching
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Blogger platform, Google Fonts, Google Adsense, Google Translate, Google Charts, Material Icons, Balloon CSS
Platforms
Blogger
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
Tynt, Whos.amung.us, Dtscout
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a Blogger-hosted MMA club site targeting Latvian audience
  2. No WHOIS registrant data available, indicating privacy protection
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  4. Cookie consent banner present with consent mechanism
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in content
  6. Uses Google Adsense and multiple tracking scripts
  7. Basic SEO and accessibility features present
  8. No security headers detected in provided data
  9. No evidence of WAF or blocking mechanisms
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audience
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Blogger platform, leveraging Google Fonts, Adsense, and Translate services. The HTML and CSS are valid but basic, with limited custom scripting. Performance is moderate with some external dependencies. Mobile optimization is basic but present. Accessibility features are minimal. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags but no advanced structured data or schema markup. The site uses multiple third-party scripts for ads and tracking, which may impact performance and privacy. Hosting is via Google's infrastructure, providing reliable uptime but limited control over server-level security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mmalatvia.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mmalatvia.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.