Skip to main content

Security report for miroslavtomasek.cz

Bc. Miroslav Tomášek · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Miroslav Tomášek operates a small, independent web development business focused on creating custom web applications primarily using WordPress. The website presents a professional image with clear service offerings, including development, WordPress site management, and consulting. The business targets clients seeking tailored web solutions in the Czech Republic. Technically, the site uses a modern stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Tag Manager, hosted on a WordPress platform with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though security headers are missing and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and business information appear legitimate and consistent. Overall, the site is well-structured and compliant with GDPR, providing clear contact details and policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching miroslavtomasek.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention miroslavtomasek.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for miroslavtomasek.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a specialized web application developer with a focus on WordPress solutions. It leverages personal branding and direct client engagement, offering individualized pricing and project management. The partnership with Vibes Vision suggests collaboration or subcontracting for larger projects. Revenue streams likely include hourly programming fees and annual WordPress maintenance contracts. The target market is local Czech clients requiring professional web development services. The business model emphasizes quality, customization, and ongoing support. Growth indicators include references to recent projects and a clear service catalog. The ecosystem includes SEO and cookie compliance tools, enhancing market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain attacks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The absence of an incident response contact or security policy limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is evident, but further enhancements in security best practices and vulnerability disclosure would strengthen the security posture. Overall, the site is secure for its business scope but could improve in formal security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response policy or provide a dedicated security contact email to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bc. Miroslav Tomášek
Registration number
05726522
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bc. Miroslav Tomášek
Description
Vytvářím webové aplikace tak, abych splnil požadavky klienta a umožnil mu zjednodušit práci s aplikací. Během konzultací vkládám do projektu i svůj pohled a navrhuji další vylepšení a funkce.
Key services
Web application development, WordPress site management, Custom template creation, Audits and migrations, Consultations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, WordPress, PHP
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO plugin
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Czech language targeting local clients.
  3. Strong GDPR and cookie compliance with visible consent management.
  4. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is properly configured.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  6. Contact info is clear and includes phone, email, and physical address.
  7. No forms detected on the main page; no direct data collection forms present.
  8. Use of common web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  9. External links mostly to trusted domains and partner site vibesvision.com.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a frontend leveraging Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, integrated with a GDPR-compliant cookie consent plugin. The site loads CSS and JS assets efficiently and uses modern fonts and icons. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The absence of advanced hosting or CDN information limits assessment of backend infrastructure. No broken links or errors were detected. The technical implementation supports a professional user experience but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with miroslavtomasek.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review miroslavtomasek.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.