Skip to main content

Security report for mintz.com

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. · Other · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. is a large, well-established Am Law 100 law firm with a global presence and a broad range of legal services including corporate law, litigation, and intellectual property. The firm maintains a professional and content-rich website built on Drupal 10, integrating modern analytics and marketing technologies while ensuring GDPR and cookie compliance. The security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available. Overall, the website reflects a mature digital presence consistent with a top-tier legal services provider.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mintz.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm holds a strong market position as a top 100 US law firm by revenue, serving corporate clients worldwide with offices in major US cities and Toronto. It leverages partnerships with ML Strategies and MintzEdge to extend its service offerings. The website content highlights thought leadership, awards, and recognitions, reinforcing credibility and trust. The business model focuses on professional legal services with a target audience of corporations and legal professionals. The firm demonstrates a commitment to diversity, innovation, and community service, which are key differentiators in the competitive legal market.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and uses reputable third-party analytics and marketing scripts with user consent mechanisms via OneTrust. Security headers are implied but not explicitly visible in the HTML. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a public security policy, vulnerability disclosure, or incident response contact reduces transparency. The firm should consider publishing these to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved with more explicit security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance frameworks.
  2. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Ensure all recommended security headers are explicitly set and verifiable.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts to mitigate supply chain risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Description
Mintz is an Am Law 100 law firm with 600 attorneys serving clients worldwide. Offices in Boston, Los Angeles, New York, San Diego, San Francisco, Washington, DC, Miami, and Toronto.
Key services
Corporate law, Litigation, Intellectual Property, Sustainable Energy & Infrastructure, Antitrust, Workplace Investigations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, CrazyEgg, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Vimeo Player, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Siteimprove Analytics, Ceros SDK
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts from reputable sources

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Siteimprove Analytics, CrazyEgg, LinkedIn Insight Tag, New Relic
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CrazyEgg, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Siteimprove Analytics, New Relic
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong presence of legal industry trust indicators.
  3. Comprehensive cookie and privacy compliance mechanisms.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  5. WHOIS data absence is notable but not critical given other trust signals.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and widely used CMS, ensuring a robust content management framework. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, CrazyEgg, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and OneTrust for cookie consent, reflecting a mature digital marketing strategy. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and SEO best practices. Performance is moderate, likely due to rich media content and multiple third-party scripts. Hosting provider details are not explicit but likely enterprise-grade given the firm's profile. Opportunities exist to enhance performance and security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mintz.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mintz.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.