Skip to main content

Security report for mikk.si

3 LAN, d.o.o. M.Sobota · Other · Slovenia

High risk. 13 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

35/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MIKK is a youth information and cultural club based in Murska Sobota, Slovenia, operating since 2007. The organization focuses on providing cultural events and informational services to the local youth and community. The website serves as a digital platform to promote these activities and engage with its audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Metrolo Premium theme and several common plugins such as Jetpack and EventON Lite, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and uses HTTPS, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy and security policies. Security posture is adequate but could be improved with better header implementation and formalized incident response information. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy for its community role but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

13 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mikk.si

This scan found 33 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
35

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a small, local non-profit cultural club targeting youth and the local community in Slovenia. It maintains a consistent brand presence and provides cultural and informational services, likely funded through local support or grants. The website does not reveal commercial activities or revenue streams, focusing instead on community engagement. The absence of detailed contact information and formal policies suggests a modest operational scale. The use of standard WordPress infrastructure and plugins indicates a practical approach to digital presence without extensive custom development. The organization appears stable with a domain age of over 15 years, reinforcing its established local presence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses common WordPress security practices but lacks several security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency in security management. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the analysis. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance to some extent, but the absence of a privacy policy reduces overall compliance confidence. Security best practices are partially followed, and improvements in policy documentation and header implementation are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  4. Create a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to enhance transparency and security posture.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to maintain security and performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
3 LAN, d.o.o. M.Sobota
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
3 LAN, d.o.o. M.Sobota
Description
Youth information and cultural club based in Murska Sobota, Slovenia, providing cultural and informational services and events.
Key services
Cultural events, Information dissemination, Community engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, FontAwesome, MediaElement.js, Plyr, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Lightbox, EventON Lite, Jetpack
Frameworks
Metrolo Premium WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of modern JS libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats (stats.wp.com)
Marketing tools
AddToAny
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based local cultural club site in Slovenia.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is present and active.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. Uses multiple common WordPress plugins and themes.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a premium theme and uses a variety of plugins for functionality including event management, social sharing, and media handling. The tech stack includes jQuery, FontAwesome, MediaElement.js, and other modern JavaScript libraries. Performance is moderate with some optimization via preloading fonts and scripts. Mobile optimization is good, and basic accessibility features are present. SEO is basic with standard meta tags but could be improved with structured data and enhanced semantic markup. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a community-focused WordPress site with room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mikk.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mikk.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.