Skip to main content

Security report for midnight.pub

Technology · France

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Midnight Pub is a niche virtual pub platform launched in 2019, offering users the ability to write posts and create pages within a community-oriented environment themed around retro internet culture and small web communities. The platform is hosted on Linode and uses a custom or unknown CMS with basic HTML and CSS technologies. The website content is accessible and primarily text-based, with a donation mechanism via buymeacoffee.com. However, the site lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and visible security best practices, which impacts its overall trust and compliance posture. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The domain registration is consistent with a small community platform, registered through 1API GmbH with a French registrant location, but with limited public registrant details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching midnight.pub

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small-scale community platform targeting users interested in writing, retro computing, and small web culture. Its business model relies on user-generated content and voluntary donations. The platform occupies a niche market position with limited competition but also limited scale. The lack of formal business information, contact details, and certifications suggests an informal or hobbyist operation rather than a commercial enterprise. Partnerships appear limited to donation processing and related community sites. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not evident from the data.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with no DNSSEC enabled and no visible security headers in the HTML content. The domain is protected against unauthorized transfers but lacks advanced domain security features. No HTTPS enforcement details are provided, and no security or incident response policies are published. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR. The platform does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the provided content, but the lack of security best practices and policies suggests room for improvement in security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC and implement domain security best practices to protect against DNS attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website.
  4. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels to enhance transparency and security readiness.
  5. Consider implementing HTTPS enforcement and regularly audit the site for vulnerabilities and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The Midnight Pub is a virtual pub platform that allows users to write posts and create pages. It presents itself as a small alley pub-themed online community space with a focus on user-generated content such as posts and pages.
Key services
Post writing, Page creation, Community engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, Linode hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited set

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page.
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers visible.
  3. No social media links detected.
  4. No forms present on the main page except login and register links (no form fields visible).
  5. No metadata such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data present.
  6. No scripts or external JS libraries detected in HTML head.
  7. Site uses Linode name servers and registrar 1API GmbH.
  8. Content is primarily text-based posts with a retro pub theme.
  9. Donation link present via buymeacoffee.com.
  10. No security headers or advanced security features visible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple HTML and CSS stack hosted on Linode with no detected CMS or frameworks. The site lacks modern SEO and accessibility features and has basic mobile optimization. No external JavaScript libraries or analytics tools are detected, indicating minimal technical complexity. Performance is likely moderate given the simple content and hosting. The absence of metadata such as Open Graph or JSON-LD limits SEO effectiveness. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist to improve SEO, accessibility, and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with midnight.pub. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review midnight.pub.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.