Skip to main content

Security report for midas-network.com

Midas Network · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Midas Network is a technology company specializing in content discovery and advertising monetization services. Established in 2016, it targets publishers, advertisers, and content creators seeking to optimize content distribution and revenue generation. The website reflects a niche market position with a focus on digital advertising technologies and content optimization. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies such as Bootstrap for responsive design, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security-wise, the site benefits from HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks advanced DNS security features like DNSSEC and does not publicly disclose incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. Overall, the website is accessible, professionally designed, and compliant with GDPR cookie consent requirements, but could improve in transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching midas-network.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention midas-network.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
267
Employees
0
Customers
267
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
2%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for midas-network.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Midas Network operates in the technology sector, focusing on content discovery and advertising monetization. Its business model revolves around providing tools and services that help publishers and advertisers optimize content reach and monetization. The company leverages partnerships with major platforms such as Google, LinkedIn, and Meta for advertising and analytics. The absence of detailed contact information and terms of service suggests a smaller or more specialized operation. The use of advanced tracking and marketing tools indicates a data-driven approach to advertising. Growth potential exists through enhanced transparency, expanded service offerings, and improved security posture. The company appears to maintain a moderate market presence with a focus on technology-driven advertising solutions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. The presence of a detailed cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR compliance efforts. However, the lack of DNSSEC implementation and absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represent areas for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which may hinder rapid mitigation of security issues. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content, and no vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided data. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be strengthened by adopting additional security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Midas Network
Description
Midas Network operates as a content discovery network, providing services related to content monetization and distribution.
Key services
Content discovery, Advertising monetization, Traffic optimization
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS, Cookiebot, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Cookiebot
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google, Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed cookie categorization.
  2. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the landing page or in metadata.
  3. No terms of service page detected.
  4. Privacy policy is present and linked via cookies dialog.
  5. Use of multiple third-party services for analytics and advertising.
  6. No visible security.txt or incident response information.
  7. Website is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
  9. Technical stack is modern but basic; Bootstrap and common JS libraries used.
  10. SEO and accessibility features are basic but present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern but standard technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Font Awesome for icons, and Google Tag Manager for analytics management. Cookiebot is employed for cookie consent and compliance, indicating attention to privacy regulations. Hosting appears to be managed via GoDaddy for domain registration and Cloudflare for DNS services, though DNSSEC is not enabled. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN-hosted libraries. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta descriptions and keywords. Accessibility features are present but limited. The site lacks a CMS indication, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with midas-network.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review midas-network.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.