Skip to main content

Security report for mida.so

Equals One Ventures Sdn. Bhd. · Technology · Malaysia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mida.so is a Malaysian-based SaaS company operating under Equals One Ventures Sdn. Bhd., offering a lightweight, no-code A/B testing platform designed for marketers and agencies. The platform emphasizes fast performance, ease of use, and seamless integration with popular analytics tools like Google Analytics 4. Positioned as a cost-effective alternative to larger incumbents, Mida.so targets fast-moving marketing teams and agencies seeking efficient conversion optimization solutions. The website features comprehensive pricing plans, customer testimonials, and case studies, reinforcing its market credibility. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS and leverages a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and other marketing and analytics tools. The site demonstrates excellent design quality, mobile optimization, and fast loading performance. However, there is a lack of explicit cookie consent mechanisms despite the use of multiple tracking pixels, which may impact privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks visible security headers and published security policies or incident response information. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable or privacy protected, which slightly reduces trust but is common for small SaaS businesses. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in transparency and compliance. Strategically, Mida.so should focus on enhancing privacy compliance by implementing cookie consent banners and publishing security and incident response policies. Improving WHOIS transparency or providing verified company contact information would also strengthen business credibility. The platform's lightweight and no-code approach is a strong differentiator in the competitive A/B testing market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mida.so

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mida.so operates in the competitive SaaS market for A/B testing and conversion optimization, targeting marketers and agencies who prioritize speed and ease of use. Its business model is subscription-based with tiered pricing plans catering to different user volumes and agency needs. The company leverages partnerships with analytics and marketing platforms to enhance its ecosystem. Growth indicators include a strong social media presence, customer testimonials, and case studies showcasing conversion lifts. The absence of direct contact information on the website suggests a focus on self-service and online engagement. The company is positioned as a lightweight alternative to established players, appealing to users seeking minimal performance impact and no-code deployment.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data detected. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates potential areas for hardening. The lack of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism reduces transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is partial, with no visible cookie consent mechanism despite extensive tracking. The WHOIS data is missing, which may be due to privacy protection but reduces domain trustworthiness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for a small SaaS provider but requiring enhancements to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  2. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website footer.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Consider providing verified company contact information and improving WHOIS transparency to enhance business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Equals One Ventures Sdn. Bhd.
Description
Mida.so is a super lightweight A/B testing tool to help you experiment, analyze and implement conversion strategies in minutes.
Key services
A/B Split Testing, URL Redirect Testing, Feature Flagging, Web Personalization, No-code Deployment, GA4 Integration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics 4, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Reddit Pixel, Webflow CMS, Zapier Interfaces, Senja Widget, Tally Forms
Frameworks
Webflow, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of multiple tracking pixels with consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, Reddit Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Reddit Pixel, Google Analytics 4, Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Zapier, Senja Widget, Tally Forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  3. Strong use of modern marketing and analytics tools.
  4. No explicit cookie consent banner detected despite tracking pixels.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, possibly due to privacy protection or registry restrictions.
  6. Website targets marketers and agencies with a SaaS A/B testing product.
  7. Pricing and feature information is transparent and detailed.
  8. Multiple customer testimonials and case studies enhance trust.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  10. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern web technologies and integrations with multiple analytics and marketing platforms. The site is optimized for performance with a small script size (~8KB) and fast load times (~20ms). It uses Google Tag Manager for event tracking and integrates with Facebook, LinkedIn, Reddit, and Plausible analytics. The design is responsive and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers or cookie consent mechanisms. The technical infrastructure is solid for a SaaS marketing tool but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium6 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mida.so. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mida.so.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.