Skip to main content

Security report for mgm-tp.com

mgm technology partners · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

mgm technology partners is an established international enterprise software company specializing in low code platforms and model-driven software engineering, targeting sectors such as public sector, retail, and industrial insurance. Their business model focuses on providing integrated software development, consulting, and security services, supported by a portfolio of related partner companies. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content tailored for enterprise clients. Technically, the site leverages modern tools including Webflow CMS, Matomo analytics with privacy-conscious configurations, and Weglot for multilingual support, indicating a high level of digital maturity. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly that slightly reduces trust but does not outweigh the overall professionalism and transparency of the site. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security transparency and publishing incident response information to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mgm-tp.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mgm-tp.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
135
Employees
3
Customers
104
Third parties
28
Weak passwords
30%

Latest record dated 2026-01-10 · 43 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for mgm-tp.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –mgmwbadmin.mgm-tp.com2026-01-10
  • –mgmwbadmin.mgm-tp.com2025-10-15
  • –mgmwbadmin.mgm-tp.com2025-07-24

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector with a focus on enterprise software solutions, particularly in low code and model-driven engineering. Their market positioning is strong within specialized industries such as public administration, retail, and industrial insurance. The business model integrates software development with consulting and security services, supported by a network of partner companies and subsidiaries. The website links to multiple related domains indicating a broad partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include active career portals and insights blogs. Revenue streams likely derive from software licensing, consulting contracts, and managed services. The company targets enterprise clients requiring customized and scalable software solutions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and privacy-respecting analytics configurations. However, the lack of a dedicated security policy page, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents gaps in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the site content. GDPR compliance is evident through privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by publishing explicit security governance documents and contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance visibility of company contact information to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
mgm technology partners
Description
mgm technology partners ist Experte für Enterprise Low Code und Model-driven Software Engineering: Public Sector, Retail, Industrieversicherung.
Key services
A12 Enterprise Low Code Platform, Model-driven software engineering, Enterprise project implementation, Consulting, Security services, SAP development and consulting
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Matomo Analytics, Weglot (translation), Google Tag Manager, SalesViewer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Matomo with disabled cookies for privacy
  • Cookie consent mechanism present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, SalesViewer
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and comprehensive content.
  2. Multiple related domains and subsidiaries are linked, indicating a larger corporate group.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main site content.
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  6. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with privacy considerations.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  8. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a commercial domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and tools such as Weglot for multilingual support and Matomo for privacy-focused analytics. The site is well-structured with valid HTML and CSS, optimized for mobile devices, and includes SEO best practices through meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and external resources. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were observed. Opportunities exist to improve hosting transparency and possibly enhance accessibility features further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mgm-tp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mgm-tp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.