Marigold · Technology · United States
Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.
Marigold is a technology company specializing in relationship marketing solutions, offering a suite of AI-powered marketing and loyalty products to over 40,000 businesses globally. The company positions itself as a leader in martech, leveraging legacy brands and modern AI capabilities to help marketers acquire, engage, and retain customers effectively. Their business model focuses on B2B SaaS solutions tailored to various industries, emphasizing customer lifetime value and personalized marketing. Technically, the website is built on WordPress hosted on WP Engine with Cloudflare CDN, utilizing modern libraries such as Bootstrap, Chart.js, and Google Tag Manager. The site demonstrates good digital maturity with SEO optimization, mobile responsiveness, and integration of marketing and analytics tools. However, performance metrics are unavailable, and accessibility is basic. From a security perspective, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support HTTPS, which is a critical vulnerability. While some security headers like Content-Security-Policy and HSTS are present, the absence of TLS protocols and secure cipher suites significantly weakens the security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are found, indicating potential gaps in security governance. Overall, the website is professionally designed and content-rich, with strong business credibility and privacy compliance. The critical lack of HTTPS severely impacts security and trustworthiness, necessitating urgent remediation. Strategic recommendations include immediate SSL deployment, enabling modern TLS protocols, and enhancing security policies to align with best practices.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention meetmarigold.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for meetmarigold.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with meetmarigold.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review meetmarigold.com.